مدرسه و فربه‌شدگی بی‌شکلی: برساخت مدرسۀ امروزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، کرج، ایران

2 دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران

10.22059/jisr.2026.409461.1709

چکیده

مدرسه در هر جامعه‌ای تلاش می‌کند تا دانش‌آموزان را جامعه‌پذیر کرده و به نحوی تربیت کند که مطابق با اهداف و آرمان‌های جامعه باشد و از این‌رو صاحب‌نظران مختلفی پیرامون آن بحث کرده‌اند.
هدف پژوهش حاضر واکاوی برساخت سازمان مدرسه در جامعۀ امروزی بوده و خواستار تبیین وضعیت مدرسه و نوع مواجهۀ آن با تربیت دانش‌آموز است. در پژوهش حاضر، با استفاده از روش گرندد تئوری، به‌طور هدفمند با 13 نفر از کارشناسان و صاحبنظران اجرایی و علمی در حوزۀ تعلیم و تربیت مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته صورت پذیرفت و در سه مرحله با نرم‌افزار مکس­کیودا کدگذاری انجام شد. درمجموع 54 کد باز و 9 کد محوری با عنوان‌های دستکش مخملی قدرت، مدرسۀ بی‌آرمان، خانوادۀ حداکثری، محوبودگی معنای استعداد، شیء‌شدگی انسان، مدرسۀ بی‌فرصت، مدرسۀ کنترلی، ابزارشدگی دانش، بازتولید وضعیت موجود و مدرسۀ مدرک‌گرا استخراج شد.
مفهوم مدرسه و فربه‌شدگی بی‌شکلی نیز به‌عنوان کد هستۀ پژوهش تعریف شد. این مفهوم بیانگر این است که مدرسۀ امروزی فاقد امکان تربیت سوژۀ مورد نظر خویش است و براساس نوع تعامل با منابع نهادی و غیرنهادی قدرت و سیاست‌گذاری‌های موجود، مدرسه به محل بازتولید شکل‌های موجود گروه‌های اجتماعی تبدیل شده است و در چنین حالتی خود مدرسه فاقد شکل‌دهی بوده و بی‌شکلی خویش را در قالب شکل‌دهی براساس سرمایۀ نمادین گروه‌ها جبران می‌کند. در این حالت مدرسه که خود فاقد شکلی معین است، نوعی از تربیت بی‌شکل را تعمیق می‌بخشد

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

School and the Hypertrophy of Formlessness: The Construction of Today's School

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ehsan Sanatkar 1
  • Mohammad Ganji 2
1 Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Farhangian University, Karaj, Iran
2 Faculty of Humanities, Department of Social Sciences, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The present article, titled “School and the Hypertrophy of Formlessness” – which has been designated as the core code serving as the central signifier in the discourse of education specialists – was conducted to examine the current state and the construction of today’s school.
Method
This qualitative study, using grounded theory, conducted semi‑structured interviews with 13 education experts at various levels. Based on the coding model, this resulted in 54 open codes and 9 axial codes.
Findings
This group, which for many years have not only worked *in* the school but also *for* the school at different decision‑making levels, believe that today’s school generally lacks a clear and definite purpose for students and is characterized by structural routinization and executor-oriented practices. Centralisation, together with a lack of will and capacity for local management, means that the mechanism, approach, and spirit of the school organisation are determined not within the school itself but from outside it. As Apple argues, when the planning process is separated from implementation, a form of alienation emerges, and the executor’s capacity is ignored for creativity and volition.
While Foucault characterizes the educational system as an apparatus of institutional power, Apple contends that this framework is incomplete. Instead, Apple posits that the school is not merely a product of top-down authority, but a contradictory synthesis of micro- and macro-level tensions across the cultural, political, and economic spectrum, the resolution of which defines the current state of schooling. Apple states that education is fundamentally political and ideological, and it is power that decides what knowledge is to be distributed and how. He raises the question of what a school is and for whom it exists, what knowledge it distributes and promotes among people and how, and he explains the relationship between education and power and the contradictory relations between them. He argues that the educational system is a function of the institution of power, controlling everything through the curriculum and allowing no other programme or activity.
However, the definition of the subject in today’s school has become entangled in a serious struggle between institutional and non‑institutional sources of power in society. The outcome of this struggle in most schools is the reproduction and hypertrophy of the same extant form.
Conclusion
The results of this research show that schools essentially make individuals ‘fatter’ – i.e., amplify them – based on what they already are. As the relevant theorists contend, this is the very nature of the educational system and the school organisation in the modern era. Indeed, the goal of the modern school is defined as serving the sources of power. Nevertheless, given the general condition of schools – apart from special and alternative schools – this core code expresses a situation in which schools, institutionally and structurally, lack both the programme and the necessary capacity to shape the subject even according to the definitions of the national policy documents. In fact, There is a rupture between will and possibility within the school. This rupture manifests itself as an exaggeration of form without content, and in the field of practice the subject becomes formless. In a sense, the school organisation reproduces listlessness and indeterminacy.
This situation does not mean that the school has no orientation; rather, it means that because of its diversity, today’s school merely assembles a homogeneous group of students and reproduces their existing social and cultural background – i.e., it makes the students ‘fatter’ in their own shape. In effect, this formlessness is the amplification of the existing state. Indeed, given the events in society and as argued by Rezaei (2005), today’s school is caught in a conflict among various discourses and regards itself as lacking a firm theoretical refuge. In such circumstances, the school, without a refuge, effectively falls into a state of stagnation and aimlessness, leading it to perceive itself as formless and indeterminate. Consequently, the school reproduces a status quo within which it has become empty and alienated, turning to credentialism. Credentialism, in turn, aligns the school with the market order and turns it into a commodity. At this point, school‑based education leads to the reification of the human being and the instrumentalisation of knowledge; everything becomes listless, and individuals are merely amplified - become ‘fatter’ - within the school based on their cultural capital, economic capital, and family background. In this state, the school itself becomes a purchasable and saleable commodity, and, according to Freire, turns into a centre for information testing. In a dialectical relationship, the school is reduced to a shapeless, identity‑less physical framework that acquires shape and identity only through the aggregation of a relatively homogeneous group of students. Hence, the school lacks the capacity for genuine “tarbiat” (education/upbringing) and merely amplifies the shape of that student group, thereby spreading its own formlessness.
Based on the conducted coding procedures, the open codes are explained according to the categories. In total, interviews were conducted with an expert group comprising 13 participants, resulting in the extraction of 54 codes and 9 core codes. Moreover, according to the statistical output using MAXQDA software, the most frequent words among this group were: school, change, society, power, credential, and identity.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Formlessness
  • Power
  • School Education
  • Student
آلتوسر، لویی (1387). ایدئولوژی و سازوبرگ‌های ایدئولوژیک دولت. ترجمۀ روزبه صدرآرا. تهران: چشمه.
اپل، مایکل دبلیو (1401). دانش رسمی: آموزش دموکراتیک در عصر محافظه‌کاری. ترجمۀ نازنین میرزابیگی. تهران: آگاه.
ایلیچ، ایوان (1398). مدرسه‌زدایی از جامعه. ترجمۀ الهه ضرغام. تهران: رشد.
برونسکی، توماس و حسن، نیسما (2020). جامعه‌شناسی آموزش‌وپرورش. ترجمۀ نوگل روحانی. تهران: هوش ناب.
فاضلی، نعمت‌الله (1402). مسئله مدرسه (بازاندیشی انتقادی در آموزش‌وپرورش ایران). تهران: نشر هوش ناب.
فریره، پائلو (1398). آموزش در جریان پیشرفت. ترجمۀ احمد بیشرک. تهران: خوارزمی.
فوکو، میشل (1393). تئاتر فلسفه. ترجمۀ نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده. تهران: نشر نی.
فوکو، میشل (1402). مراقبت و تنبیه، تولد زندان. ترجمۀ نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده. تهران: نشر نی.
قادرزاده، امید و رستمی‌زاده، شیرزاد (1400). تجربۀ طرد اجتماعی و خشونت‌ورزی در میدان مدرسه: مردم‌نگاری انتقادی خشونت‌ورزی دانش‌آموزان مدارس متوسطۀ دوم پسران سنندج. فصلنامۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 10(3), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2021.312124.1140
عباس‌زاده، محمد و علمدار سرند، زینب (1402). مطالعۀ جامعه‌شناختی عوامل زمینه‌ساز رفتارهای مخاطره‌آمیز در بین دانش‌آموزان (مورد مطالعه: دانش‌آموزان دورۀ متوسطۀ دوم شهر تبریز). فصلنامۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 12(4)، 589-607. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2021.329562
غفاری، ابوالغضل و کرامتی، انسیه (1392). بنیان‌های فلسفی اندیشۀ پائولو فریره و دلالت‌های آن برای برنامۀ درسی. فصلنامۀ پژوهش در مسائل تعلیم و تربیت، 1(63)، 5-34.
میرزامصطفی، صدیقه، ریاحی، محمداسماعیل، و شارع‌پور، محمود (1398). آموزش‌های پنهان مدرسه و تجارب زیستۀ دانش‌آموزان. فصلنامۀ جامعه‌شناسی نهادهای اجتماعی، 6(14)، 233-260. https://doi.org/10.22080/ssi.2020.16619.1611  
میلر، پیتر (1393). سوژه، استیلا و قدرت. ترجمۀ نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده. تهران: نشر نی.
نظری، مرتضی (1397). مرگ مدرسه: گفتارهای انتقادی در آموزش‌وپرورش ایران. تهران: مشق شب.
Altusser, L. (2008). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (R. Sadra, Trans.). Tehran: Cheshmeh. (In Persian)
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). NLB Press.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculumRoutledge & Kegan Paul.
Apple, M. W. (2022). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (N. Mirzabeygi, Trans.). Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)
Abbaszadeh, M., & Alamdar Sarand, Z. (2023). Sociological study of underlying factors of risky behaviors among students (Case study: Secondary high school students in Tabriz). Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 12(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2021.329562 (In Persian)
Illich, I. (2019). Deschooling society (E. Zargham, Trans.). Tehran: Roshd. (In Persian)
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, C. (1977). Les héritiers. Éditions de Minuit.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approachesSage.
Bronski, T., & Hassan, N. (2020). Sociology of education (N. Ruhani, Trans.). Tehran: Hush-e Nab. (In Persian)
Fazeli, N. (2023). The problem of school (A critical rethinking of education in Iran). Tehran: Hush-e Nab. (In Persian)
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the city. New York, NY: Continuum.
Freire, P., & Faundes, A. (1985). Learning to question: Pedagogy of liberationWorld Council of Churches.
Foucault, M. (2014). Theater of philosophy (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
Foucault, M. (2023). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theoryAldine.
Ghaffari, A., & Karamati, E. (2013). Philosophical foundations of Paulo Freire's thought and its implications for curriculum. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Issues, 48(2), 1-28. (In Persian)
Ghadirzadeh, O., & Rostamizadeh, S. (2021). The experience of social exclusion and violence in the school field: A critical ethnography of violence among male high school students in Sanandaj. Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 10(3), 887-917. (In Persian)
Jackson, S. (1997). Crossing borders and changing pedagogies: From Giroux and Freire to feminist theories of education. Gender and Education, 9(4), 457-467.
Kentli, F. D. (2009). Comparison of hidden curriculum theories. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 83-88.
Mirmostafa, S., Riahi, M. E., & Sharepour, M. (2019). Hidden curriculum of school and students' lived experiences. Quarterly Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions, 6(14), 260-233. (In Persian)
Miller, P. (2014). Subject, domination, and power (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
Nazari, M. (2018). The death of school: Critical discourses on education in Iran. Tehran: Mashgh-e Shab. (In Persian)
Ng, K., & Hase, S. (2008). Grounded suggestions for doing grounded theory business research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(2), 155-170.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (1st ed.). Sage.