سرمایۀ اجتماعی کار و تولید، بهره‌وری و توسعۀ اقتصادی–اجتماعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه برنامه‌ریزی اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران

2 استادیار مرکز تحقیقات مدیریت رفاه اجتماعی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توان‌بخشی

3 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه‌شناسی توسعۀ اجتماعی-روستایی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

 موضوع سرمایۀ اجتماعی طی سال‌های اخیر وارد مباحث اقتصادی شده و در کنار سرمایه‌های فیزیکی و انسانی به آن توجه جدی شده است. همچنین مطالعات نشان می‌دهد سرمایۀ اجتماعی، نقشی بسیار مهم‌تر از سرمایۀ فیزیکی و انسانی در جوامع ایفا می‌کند و بدون آن، پیمودن راه‌های توسعۀ اجتماعی و اقتصادی، ناهموار و دشوار است. در این مطالعه به بررسی وضعیت سرمایۀ اجتماعی جامعۀ کار و تولید با استفاده از روش پیمایش و تکنیک پرسشنامه در استان تهران پرداخته شده است. به‌منظور سنجش پایایی و روایی ابزار مطالعه، به­ترتیب از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و دو نوع اعتبار صوری و سازه استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد سرمایۀ اجتماعی شامل اعتماد اجتماعی، مشارکت اجتماعی، هنجارهای اجتماعی، حمایت اجتماعی و روابط اجتماعی در بین افراد از میزان مطلوبی برخوردار نیست. در این بین وضعیت مشارکت اجتماعی بدتر از سایر مؤلفه‌هاست. همچنین نتایج بیانگر آن است که وضعیت اعتماد اجتماعی، مسئولیت‌پذیری افراد و رعایت هنجارها در کنار شرایط رفتاری و ساختاری مناسب از جمله عواملی هستند که موجب افزایش سرمایۀ اجتماعی در چنین محیط‌هایی می‌شوند. علاوه بر این، شبکه‌های اجتماعی و پیوندهای قوی در پیداکردن شغل و کاهش ریسک بیکاری مؤثر هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Social Capital in Work Place, Productivity and Socio-Economic Development

نویسندگان [English]

  • Malihe Shaini 1
  • Mohammad Ali Mohammadi Gharehghani 2
  • Hanan Zare 3
1 PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor, Social Planning Department, Social Sciences factually, University of Tehran
2 Assistant Professor, Social Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Candidate in Social Development Studies, Social Sciences factually, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The social capital subject has become a major topic in economic debates and considered to be a vital issue along with physical and human capital in recent decades. Without social capital, investing in physical and human capital cannot be productive and also without creating trust among workforces in workplaces there cannot be an effective social capital to promote productivity. Studies have shown that social capital has more important role than other types of capitals and without this, it would be so difficult to obtain cultural and economic development. In addition, Tehran is one of the most major province of Iran that has the most employee and therefore, various activities going on in industrial areas that represents the condition of social capital indicator in the country's workplace. Thus, this study is conducted to examine social capital in workplaces and production communities as well.
Method: The method of research was survey by using questionnaire technique. In order to measure reliability the Cronbach's coefficient alpha was used and two type of validity including face and construct validity were tested. 500 employee selected by random sample in industrial province of Tehran and data were analyzed by SPPSS.
Findings: Findings have shown that the amount of social capital including social trust, social participation, social norms, social support and social relationship among these employee was average. (30.6 percent had high amount of social capital, 32.40 percent average and 37 percent low). The results of the survey also have indicated that the level of social capital was somewhat average. Low social capital makes efficiency low. So it must be increase in social capital to increase productivity. Social networks and strong links were effective factors in finding jobs and reducing the risk of unemployment, and according to study large percentage of people found their jobs through social network.
Discussion and conclusion: Therefore, it should be noted that low social capital makes labor efficiency and productivity down, then in order to increase labor productivity, their social capital has to be increased; social networks and links have also been effective in finding jobs and reducing unemployment risk. Since the social participation was worse than other components, it seems that attention to the issue of participation could be a first step towards increasing social capital in the workplace and subsequently increasing productivity. According to research findings related to trust, it seems that appropriate mechanisms should be put in place to increase trust in work place. Keywords: Social Capital, workplace, Labor and Production, Productivity, Labor and Production Society, Socio-Economic Development

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • social capital social capital labor and production productivity labor and production community economic
  • social development
  • آقانصیری، مریم (1390)، «نقش سرمایۀ اجتماعی در بهره‌وری نیروی کار»، ماهنامه کار و جامعه، شمارۀ 137: 1-13.
  • پیران، پرویز؛ موسوی، میرطاهر و ملیحه شیانی (1385)، سنجش سرمایۀ اجتماعی در ایران، تهران: سازمان برنامه و بودجه.
  • تاجبخش، کیان؛ ثقفی، مراد و مسعود کوهستانی­نژاد (1382)، «سرمایۀ اجتماعی و سیاست‌های اجتماعی (بررسی وضعیت سرمایۀ اجتماعی در ایران امروز)»، فصلنامۀ رفاه اجتماعی، شمارۀ 10: 155-198.
  • ذکایی، محمدسعید و پیام روشنفکر (1385)، «جوانان، سرمایۀ اجتماعی و رفتارهای داوطلبانه»، فصلنامۀ رفاه اجتماعی، شمارۀ 23: 113-146.
  • شارع­پور، محمود (1387)، «روند جهانی در سنجش سرمایۀ اجتماعی: اثرپذیری از حوزه سیاست‌گذاری اجتماعی»، فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، شمارۀ 69 و 68: 5-29.
  • شریفیان ثانی، مریم (1380)، «سرمایۀ اجتماعی: مفاهیم اصلی و چارچوب نظری»، فصلنامۀ رفاه اجتماعی، شمارۀ 2: 5-18.
  • ·       غفاری، غلامرضا (1394)، «سنجش سرمایۀ اجتماعی؛ گزارش کشوری در مقیاس نسلی»، تهران: وزارت کشور.
    • Aghanassiri, M. (2011), “The Role of Social Capital in Labor Productivity”, Work and Society, No. 137: 1–13. (In Persian)
    • Allen, D. W. (2006), “The Duel of Honor: Screening for Unobservable Social Capital”, American Law and Economics Review, No 8: 81–115.
    • Arezzo, M. (2013), “Social Capital and Undeclared Work: An Empirical Analysis in Italy from 1998 to 2008”, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, No. 118: 695–709.
    • Cohen, D. A. (2000), In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    • Ellinger, D. A. L. (2011), “Organizational Investments in Social Capital, Managerial Coaching, and Employee Work-Related Performance”, Management Learning, No. 42: 67–85.
    • Fu, Q. (2004), Trust, Social Capital, and Organizational Effectiveness, MSs Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    • Ghafari, G. (2015), Measurement of Social Capital, Tehran: Ministry of Interior. (In Persian)
    • Ghoshal, J. N. (1998), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantag, The Academy of Management Review, No 23: 242–266.
    • Keefer, P., and Knack, S. (2003), Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics, MPRA Paper 25025, University Library of Munich, Germany, Revised 2004. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25025/
    • Mel Evans, and Stephen Syrett. (2007), “Economics of Social Capital: Implications for Organizational Performance”, European Urban and Regional Studies, No. 14: 55–74.
    • Mesut Akdere, and Paul B. R. (2008), “Economics of Social Capital: Implications for Organizational Performance”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, No 10: 802–816.
    • Michael B., and Aguilera, D. S. (2003),” Social Capital and the Wages of Mexican Migrants: New Hypotheses and Tests”, Social Forces, No. 82: 671–701.
    • Parks-Yancy, R. (2006), “The Effects of Social Group Membership and Social Capital Resources on Career”, Journal of Black Students, No 36: 515-545.
    • Pastoriza, D. (2013), “Does the Ethical Leadership of Supervisors Generate Internal Social Capital”, Journal of Business Ethics, No. 118: 1–12.
    • Piran, P., Mousavi, M., and Shayani, M. (2016), Measurement of Social Capital in Iran, Tehran: Planning and Budget Organization. (In Persian)
    • Requena, F. (2003), “Social Capital, Satisfaction and Quality of Life in the Workplace”, Social Indicators Research, No. 61: 331–360. (In Persian)
    • Requena, F. (2003), “Social Capital, Satisfaction and Quality of Life in the Workplace”, Social Indicators Research, No. 61: 331–360.
    • Sabatini, F. (2008), “Does Social Capital Improve Labour Productivity in Small and Medium Enterprises?” International Journal of Management and Decision Making, No. 9: 454–480.
    • Share'pour, M. (2008), “The Global Trend in Measuring Social Capital: The Impact of Social Policy Making”, Management and Development Process, No. 68, 69: 5-29. (In Persian)
    • Sharifian-Sani M. (2002), “Social Capital: Main Concepts and Conceptual Framework”, Refah Journal, No 2: 5–18.
    • Sharone, O. (2014), Social Capital Activation and Job Searching: Embedding the Use of Weak Ties in the American Institutional Context, Work and Occupation, No 41: 409-439.
    • Tajbakhsh, K., Saghafi, M., and Koohestaninejad, M. (2003), “Social Capital and Social Policies (Investigating the Status of Social Capital in Today’s Iran)”, Social Welfare Quarterly, No. 3: 155–198. (In Persian)
    • Tymon, W., and Stumpf, S. (2001), “Social Capital in the Success of Knowledge Workers”, Career Development International, No. 8: 12–22.
    • Woolcock, M. (1998), “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward A Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework”, Theory and Society, No. 27: 151–208.
    • Zokai, M., and Roshanfekr, P. (2006), “Youth, Social Capital, and Voluntary Behaviors”, Social Welfare Quarterly, No. 23: 133-146. (In Persian)