The Dilemma of Social Trust and the Challenge of Governance in Contemporary Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jisr.2024.386485.1563

Abstract

A social-cultural reality, social trust is rooted in the contexts and experiences of a historical-social society. The emergence of a culture of trust in a society and its integration into the normative system of the society are empowering factors that have a variety of effects and functions at different levels. The socio-cultural norm of trust underscores the fact that decisions regarding trust are deeply rooted in the social and cultural context. Due to this, trust is established within the social environment and is subsequently fortified over time. In the contemporary complex society, trust is a fundamental prerequisite for the economic, social, cultural, and political development of any society. It is a pre-contractual element and a precursor to social life. In this paper, an attempt is made to theoretically and empirically examine the relationship between social trust and governance in contemporary Iran (over the past three decades) by examining the construction of trust in two forms: universalistic trust and particularistic trust.
The research method is a single study that employs the secondary analysis of national survey data, the registration data of the Statistics Center and the Central Bank, and information and inferential findings from the researchers’ studies.
The radius and scope of the field of trust are the characteristic and criterion that serve as the foundation for the development of trust in both particularistic and universalistic forms. The first one has a restricted scope that primarily aims to fortify intra-group relations in the form of a small “us” and does not acknowledge trust or relationships with non-insiders. Conversely, generalist trust establishes the scope of trust and interaction beyond insiders, prioritizes trust and trans-group and inter-group relationships, and emphasizes the collective “us.” Collective action and play in a wider and broader field are necessary to achieve development, as opposed to the limited and small fields that result from particularistic trust. This importance is associated with universalistic trust and necessitates a transition from community to society. The presupposition of this paper is that the formation and quality of effective governance are contingent upon the presence of universalistic trust.
The results of this study indicate that in contemporary Iran, in addition to the challenge of decreasing trust, universal trust is at a low level compared to particularistic trust. The dominance and superiority of particularistic trust is one of the factors of disorder in the governance process at the local and national scales, as well as in the way of responding to the global community.

Keywords


Ahrne, G. (2022). Att se samhället, Translated by Hassan Hosainiei Koljahi, Tehran, Afkar  Jadid Press. (In Persian)
Behbodhi, D. et al (2013). The effect of oil revenues on social capital in Iran, Economic Research Quarterly (sustainable growth and development), 13(3): 109-124. (In Persian)
Benfield, E. C. (1967). The moral basic of a backward society. New York: Free Press.
Bevir, M. (2007). Governance, in encyclopedia of governance. Eds, Mark, Bevier, London, sage.
Bowles, S. (2010). Social capital, Governence and Society, Translated by Afshin Khakbaz and Hassan Pooyan, Tehran, Shirazeh Press. (In Persian)
Chalabi, M. (2013). Theoritical and Comparative Analisis in Sociology. Tehran, Nei Press.  (In Persian)
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Translated by Manochehre Saboori, Tehran, Nei Press. (In Persian)
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London, Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Values and its Creation of Prosperity, Translated by Said Alireza Beheshti Shirazi,Tehran, Rovzeneh Press. (In Persian)
Gholipoor, A. (2005). Good Governence and Fitting Pattern State, Tehran, Strategic Research Center. (In Persian)
Giddenze. A. (1990). Sociology, Translated by Manochehre Saboori, Tehran, Nei Press. (In Persian)
Haynes, J. (2006) Development Studies, Translated by Reza Shirazi and Javad Ghabadii, Tehran, Aghah Press. (In Persian)
Held, D. (2000). Models of Democracy, Translated by Abass Mokhber, Tehran, Rovshanghran Press. (In Persian)
Jeffrey C. Goldfarb (1991) The Cynical Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mahdavi. A and Azizmohamadlo. H (2016). Social capital and industrial development in Iran, Tehran, Nei Press. (In Persian)
Mehta, D. M. (2006). Good governance. Encyclopedia of Governance. Sage Publications, Inc Bottiglieri, W. A., Reville, P. J., & Grunewald, D. (2009). The Enron collapse-the aftershocks. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics25(2), 1-9.
 Ministry of Interior (2005). Survey of Measurement Social Capital, Tehran, Ministry of Interior. (In Persian)
 Ministry of Interior (2014). Survey of Measurement Social Capital, Tehran, Ministry of Interior. (In Persian)
 Ministry of Interior (2018). Survey of Measurement Social Capital, Tehran, Ministry of Interior. (In Persian)
Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Polity Press.
Offe, C. (2010) How can we trust our fellow citizens? Translated by Afshin Khakbaz and Hassan Pooyan, Tehran, Shirazeh Press. (In Persian)
Office National Plans (2003). Survey of Values ​​and Attitudes of Iranians, Tehran, Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (In Persian)
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). The state and public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rahimikia, A. and Eftekhari, A (2020). A comparative study of the approach of the 8th and 9th governments of the Islamic Republic to cultural and social non-governmental organizations, Islamic World Political Research Quarterly, 10(1): 27-48.http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23222980.1399.10.1.5.6 (In Persian)
Rose, R. (2013). Uses of Social Capital in Russia: Modern, Pre-modern, and Anti-modern, Translated by Afshin Khakbaz and Hassan Pooyan, Tehran, Shirazeh Press. (In Persian)
Rothstein, B (2005). Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Translated by Laden Rahberi, Mahmood Sharepoor, Mohammed Fazeli and Sajad Fattahi, Tehran, Aghah Press. (In Persian)
Saligman, A.(2008). Trust, voulantry Association and Civil Society. In: Trust and Social Capital. Eds Faran Tonkis, Translated by Mohammad Teghi Delferooze, Tehran, Institue Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian)
Sarieolghlam, M. (2007). Political Cultuer of Iran, Tehran, Institue Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian)
Sennett, R. (1401). Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation, Translated by Mohammad Reza Fadaei, Tehran, Shirazeh Press. (In Persian)
Statistical Center of Iran (2004). Statistical Yearbook, Office of publications and information (In Persian)
Statistical Center of Iran (2005). Statistical Yearbook, Office of publications and information (In Persian)
Statistical Center of Iran (2018). Statistical Yearbook, Office of publications and information (In Persian)
Statistical Center of Iran (2020). Statistical Yearbook, Office of publications and information (In Persian)
Stieglitz, J. E. (1998). Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies, and Processes. Lecture at UNCTAD, Geneva.
Sztompka, P. (1999) Trust a Sociological Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, E. (1999). Democracy and Social Capital. Democracy and Trust/Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, E. M (2007). The Bulging Pocket and the Rule of Law: Corruption, Inequality, and Trust. Under Contract to Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Volunteering and social capital: how trust and religion shape civic participation in the United States. In Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 104-117). Routledge.
Walzer, M. (1997). Toleration, Translated by Saleh Najafi, Tehran, Shirazeh Press. (In Persian)