Social Indicator System: Towards Designing and Developing Conceptual Models for Iranian Society

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jisr.2023.358286.1396

Abstract

Policymakers and social scientists are primarily concerned with examining and tracking the social condition of the community. A considerable number of organizations publish social reports, the majority of which are presented in a fragmented, sectional, and non-exhaustive fashion. Constructing and implementing a “social indicators system” is the most efficacious resolution to this dilemma. The term “social indicators system” refers to a collection of indicators that have been deliberately and methodically chosen, precisely defined, and organized in accordance with a theoretical framework. Recognizing the significance of the topic, the purpose of this article is to construct and consolidate a conceptual framework for assessing the social condition, with a particular focus on Iranian society.
The present study employed a mixed methodological design, incorporating in-depth interviews with specialists and elites as well as documentary methods. The methodology employed in the development of the social indicators system is one that is centered on concepts.
To assess the social standing of Iranian society, three distinct and autonomous conceptual frameworks have been formulated and constructed. 1) According to the “development level measurement” framework, the social situation is comprised of three primary elements: the “interaction system,” the “livelihood system” and the “distribution system.” These components correspond to “social capital,” “quality of life” and “human development,” respectively. 2) The “monitoring of social changes” model examines the condition of the value system structure at the micro level and the process of structural changes in the domains of demographics, stratification, and technology at the macro level. 3) “The pathological model views the social situation as an examination of the state of social problems.”
The social problem is defined as an unfavorable circumstance resulting from a disruption in the dimensions of development or the rapid occurrence of changes in social structures, according to this model.

Keywords


  • Afrakhteh, H. (1995). Role of Iran’s demographic structure in development and its relationship with human resources training. Persian Language & Literature Journal, 6(4), 11-36. (In Persian)
  • Bernardi, F., González, J. J., & Requena, M. (2006). The sociology of social structure, in: B. Bryant and D. Peck (eds.). 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, Newbury: Sage.
  • Bryant, C. G. A. (1985). Positivism in social theory and research. London: Macmillan.
  • Chalabi, M. (1996). Sociology of Order: explanation and theoretical analysis of social order. Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
  • Chalabi, M. (2006). Social analysis in action space. Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
  • Chalabi, M. (2014). Theoretical and comparative analysis in sociology. Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
  • COBB, C. W., & Craig, R. (1998). Competing Paradigms in the Development of Social and Economic Indicators. Paper presented at the CSLS Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada. Ottawa, October 30-31.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. (1994). Foundation of Social Theory. Cambridge.
  • De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research Design in Social Research. Translated by: H. Nayebi. Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)
  • Ebrahimabadi, H. (2014). A Study of the Relationship between Information Technology and Changes in Culture and Social Relationships. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research6(4), 83-106. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.7508/ijcr.2013.24.004
  • Eitzen, D. S., Baca Zinn, M., & Smith, K. E. (2011) Social problems. Translated by: H. Nayebi. Tehran: Research Center for Culture, Art and Communication publication. (In Persian)
  • Erikson, R. (1993). Descriptions of Inequality: The Swedish Approach to Welfare Research. In: The Quality of Life. Ed. by M. Nussbaum; A. Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eyler, J. M. (1979). Victorian Social Medicine: The Ideas and Methods of William Farr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Field, J. (2017). Social Capital. Translated by: Gh. R. Ghafari & H. Ramezani. Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)
  • Fulkerson, G., Thomas, A., Ho, J. M., Zians, J., Seale, E., McCarthy, M., & Han, S. (2023). COVID-19 and Social Capital Loss: The Results of a Campus Outbreak. Social Indicators Research165(3), 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03043-z
  • Ghafari, G., Karimi, A., & Nozari, H. (2012). Trend study of quality of life in Iran. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran1(3), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2013.36564 (In Persian)
  • Grootaert, Christiaan; Van Bastelar, Thierry. 2002. Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Directions in Development; © Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Puttnam, R. (2002). The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hezarjaribi, J., & SafariShali, R. (2012) Anatomy of welfare. Tehran: Society and Culture publication. (In Persian)
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2012). Measuring of the Information Society. Geneva Switzerland.
  • Karami T. (2014). The Role of Social Stratification in the Spatial Distribution of Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards in the City of Tehran. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazard, 1(1), 67-83. http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2315-fa.html (In Persian)
  • Khaliah, A. M. (1999) Psychological Study of the Evolution of Values. Translated by: H. Seyedi. Mashhad: Behnashr. (In Persian)
  • Latifi, G. R., (2010) Principles planning and Social Policy. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi of Allameh Tabataba'i University. (In Persian)
  • Lecuyer, Bernard, and Anthony R. Oberschall. 1968. "Sociology: Early History of Social Research" In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 15: 36-53. New York: Macmillan.
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Macionis, J. J. (2019) Social Problems. Translated by: H. Nayebi. Tehran: Research Center for Culture, Art and Communication Publication. (In Persian)
  • Madani Ghohfarrokhi, S. (2017) The Situation of human development in Iran; Vulnerability and resilience, Tehran: Ketab Parseh. (In Persian)
  • Maleki, A. (2005) A Study of Value System of Iranian Society; emphasizing on Modernization and Cultural Change of Ronald Inglehart. Doctoral dissertation of Sociology, University of Isfahan. (In Persian)
  • Maleki, A. (2019). Compilation of social indicators system for Iranian society. Social Affairs Organization of the country. (In Persian)
  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Moghadas, A. A. (2006). Changing the structure of social classes in the era before the Islamic revolution (Pahlavi era) and after the revolution until 1987. International Congress on the Explanation of the Islamic Revolution Proceedings (vol2). Tehran: The Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. (In Persian)
  • Noll, Heinz-Herbert (2014). European System of Social Indicators. In: Alex C. Michalos (editor in chief). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer.
  • Noll, Heinz-Herbert (2014). Systems of Indicators. In: Alex C. Michalos (editor in chief). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer
  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277.https://doi.org/10.2307/3088895
  • Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of Life; Concept, Policy and Practice. London: Rutledge.
  • Rafiei, H., Madani-Ghohfarrokhi, S., & Vameghi, M. (2008). Priorities of Social Problems in Iran. Iranian Journal of Sociology9(1,2), 151-160. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17351901.1387.9.1.8.3 (In Persian)
  • Rafiepour F. (1998) Anatomy of Society: An Introduction to Applied Sociology. Tehran: Entesharco (sherkate Sahamiye Enteshar). (In Persian)
  • Rodrigues, J., Chicau Borrego, C., Ruivo, P., Sobreiro, P., Catela, D., Amendoeira, J., & Matos, R. (2020). Conceptual Framework for the Research on Quality of Life. Sustainability12(12), 4911. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12124911
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press
  • Saraei, H. (2007). The application of the results of general censuses in the study of the structure and evolution of the social stratification of Iran. Journal of Population Association of Iran2(3), 5-29. (In Persian)
  • Sasanpour, S., & Moftakhari, H. (2011). The change of social stratification system in Iran from the fall of Sasanian to the end of Omavids. Social History Research, 1(1), 79-96. (In Persian)
  • Sen, A. (2000). A decade of human development. Journal of human development1(1), 17-23.
  • Smith, J. A. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: Free Press.
  • Steele, S. F., & Price, J. (2004). Applied Sociology: Term, Topics, Tools, and Tasks. Translated by: Malek & M. Hobbevatan. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
  • Studenski, P. (1958). The Income of Nations; Theory, Measurement, and Analysis: Past and Present. New York: New York University Press.
  • Tamana, S. (2008) Demography. Tehran: Payame Noor University Publication. (In Persian)
  • Tavakol, M., & Erfanmanesh, I. (2016). Knowledge, technology, & the new society: A perception, based on sociology of knowledge, through the Daniel Bell’s ideas of the information & post-industrial society. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran5(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2016.59238 (In Persian)
  • Uusitalo, H. (1994). Social Statistics and Social Reporting in the Nordic Countries. In: Social Statistics and Social Reporting in and for Europe. Ed. by P. Flora; F. Kraus; H.-H. Noll; F. Rothenbacher. Bonn: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften, 1994, p. 99-120.
  • Zapf, W. (1984). Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und wahrgenommene Lebensqualität. In: Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik. Ed. by W. Glatzer; W. Zapf. - Frankfurt a.M./ New York: Campus, p. 13-26.