Representing the mythical of Milad Tower using Roland Barthes semiotics

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Master of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Introduction: Urban symbols and signs are an integral part of analyzing and reading of the morphology and meaning and the different layers of the city, but reading urban signs without taking into account the context and context in which the sign is located and the interaction of this sign with other signs outside and have their own content; Both residents and citizens who consume the urban symbol, the history of the events that the urban symbol experiences is impossible. The analysis of the semiotics of the Milad Tower is consistent with the study of the events and developments that have taken place in recent years and decades in the country’s politics and administration and manifested in the urban context and in a symbolic format.
Methods: This research uses the semiotic method of Roland Barthes to re-read and reinterpret the Milad Tower in order to understand and recognize these changes and developments. Roland Barthes clarifies the relationship between primary meaning and secondary meaning or myth in two parts. He insists that he makes his mythic signifier ambiguous: The signifier is synonymous with the same form; it is full on one side and empty on the other. The significance of this statement is that the military salute of a young black man is a tangible reality and, more importantly, it belongs to history. The young black man had a special life before he joined the military, and unless myth takes hold of him and turns him into a parasite, he is completely self-sufficient and has meaning. Barthes suggests that the mythological signifier is full of meaning and points to that historicity, but when the meaning is transformed into a form, it becomes empty.
Finding: If we want to consider the mythology of Milad Tower in terms of meaning and form, and consider the mythological signifier consisting of meaning and form as a cohesive whole, then we consider Milad Tower as a telecommunication tower serving the development of urban communication and telecommunication infrastructures. Let us assume that it is to respond to the communication services of Tehran citizens. This meaning of the tower was the primary goal and also something that was included in the goals of the tower and the intentions of its builders. But this meaning has undergone distortion in the process of taking shape and subsequent myth-making. It has become a commercial, entertainment, and restaurant center, and in some ways a base for consumption and luxury that has become a form. It is this packaging that forms the myth of Milad Tower and shows consumption and luxury in this myth. This meaning and form does not hide or conceal itself in any way, but it is the appearance and interior of consumption that make up the ideological aspect of this myth. As a myth of consumption, Milad Tower, in addition to the ideological dimension of consumption, requires supervision and diligence to advance the project for which it is responsible. The height of this tower is like a nose that watches over the consumption behavior of citizens. Surveillance in the form of eyes and looks and waiting for more consumption and the display of this luxury is always demanded and desired by society and the tower as a whole between all these behaviors. This is a terrible control system in the form of consumption and trying to keep up with the caravan that dominates and monitors society.
Conclusion: The results of this research show that consumption and luxury are the orders that adorn the myth of Milad Tower, and like the omniscient who has the power to control and inject norms from above, consumption has ruled over society and led the people of society to this value, and those who do not follow this rule are held accountable. Urban identity in Tehran is thus shaped by consumption and myth-making around the Milad Tower and by becoming a part of it, which drives many people out of this sense of belonging.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Ahmadipour, Zahra and Khojam Lee, Abdul Wahab and Pour Jafar, Mohammad Reza (2015), Geopolitical analysis of factors influencing the symbolization of the geographical spaces of Tehran (case study: Symbolization of Milad Tower), Geopolitics Quarterly,No2(13),25-39 (in Persian).
  • Alikhah, Fardin (1379), Modern man in the context of comprehensive surveillance, book of the month of social sciences (in Persian).
  • Barrett, Rolan (2010), Mythology in the Present Time, translated by Yusuf Abazari, Organon/18(in Persian).
  • Barrett, Roland (2010), Eiffel Tower, translated by Yusuf Abazari, Organon Magazine, No. 19(in Persian).
  • Barthes, Roland (1976), Mythologies, Norwich, Pladin
  • Barthes, Roland (1997), The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies, translated to English by Richard Howard, University of California Press; Reprint edition.
  • Bozovic, Miran (1995), In: Bentham, Jeremy and Miran Božovič. The Panopticon and other prison writings. New York: Verso

·         Chadwick, Andrew (2006) Internet politics: states, citizens, and communication technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.

·         Dieter Evers, Hans and Ramli Nordin (2012), The Symbolic Universe of Cyberjaya, Malaysia,.

  • Dreyfus, Hubert and Rabino, Paul (2003), Michel Foucault, Super structuralism and Hermeneutics, translation: Hossein Bashiriyeh. Ni publication (in Persian).
  • Foucault, Michel (2012), Care and Punishment (The Birth of Prison), translated by Ramin Jahandideh and Niko Sarkhosh, Nei Publishing (in Persian).
  • Ghobadi, Mahnaz (2018), Investigating the factors affecting the level of consumerism of Renan in Tehran (in terms of consumption of cosmetics), Master's thesis of Al-Zahra University(in Persian).
  • Gill, Stephen (2003), Globalization, Market Civilization and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. In Globalization: critical concepts in sociology, edited by Roland Robertson and Kathleen White, 256–281. London: Rutledge.
  • Hosseini, Mohammad Reza and Alinejad, Manouchehr and Pirinejad, Mohammad (2017), Consumerism and sociological factors affecting it among the youth of Tehran, two quarterly journals of contemporary sociological research, Volume 7,No 13.
  • Khazaei, Yaqub (2015), The prison construction process (from the constitution to the end of the first Pahlavi), first edition, Age publishing house (in Persian).
  • Kianpour, Alireza (2017), The interpretation of urban symbols and signs from the perspective of layered semiotics (case example: Tehran's Freedom Tower), the first national conference on semiology in Iranian art(in Persian).

·         Meikle, Graham and Sherman Young (2012),Media Convergence: Networked Digital Media in Everyday Life. London:Palgrave Macmillan

  • Moghadam Heydari, Gholamhosein (2015),Evaluation of the effect of universal architecture on Foucault's theory of power, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Methodology of Human Sciences, , No.89(20),(in Persian).
  • Mohammad Hosni, Elina and Taghraei, Abolfazl and Mirgholami, Morteza (2015), Typological analysis of factors affecting the legibility of urban signs (case study: Valiasr Street (A) Tehran, Vanak Square to Tajrish Square), City Management, No. 20(5),(in Persian).
  • Moriarty, Michael (1991) Roland Barthes Cambridge, Polity.
  • Mousavi, Yaqoub and Ahmadi, Taybeh (2013), The effect of urban commercial advertising on the consumerism of women in Tehran, socio-cultural development study, Volume 1,No 4.
  • Naderi, Ahmad and Akbari Golzar, Mahdi and Fazli, Zahra (2018), Collective memory and its effect on the formation of urban identity (case study: Vahdat Islamic neighborhood and Shahrak Gharb), Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, Volume 8, No 3, 533 -556.
  • Nourbakhsh, Seyyed Navid and Jafari, Pejman and Ghafari, Farhad and Mansoorian, Yazdan (2017), Demonstration consumption of youth: the future of consumerism, scientific research journal of the future of management, volume 29, No 4 (115), (in Persian).
  • Nozer, Naghmeh and Azadaramaki, Taghi (2014), A comparative study of two urban symbols in Tehran; Azadi Tower and Milad Tower (from the perspective of Iranian-Islamic identity), Viet-oriented National Architecture and Urban Planning Conference(in Persian)..
  • Rabiei, Ali and Rafiei, Maleke (2012), Consumerism: From compulsion to pleasure, a sociological study of consumerism among residents of Tehran, Journal of Sociology, Volume 17, No 1-2,4. (in Persian).
  • Reza Aamili, Seyed Saeed and Akhwan, Manijeh (2012), Representation of urban identity elements in travelogues: (Comparative study of Tehran and cities of Tehran Province), Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, Volume 1, No4, -74 100(in Persian).
  • Seidman, Steven (2008), The conflict of votes in sociology, translated by Hadi Jalili, Ney Publishing (in Persian).
  • Shia, Esmail and Behzadfar, Mostafa and Namdarian, Ahmed Ali (2016), Compilation of the theoretical framework of the urban landscape with the help of the theory of space production and the forces affecting the urban landscape, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Urban Studies, No24(in Persian).
  • Smart, Barry (1385), Michel Foucault, translated by Hassan Chavoshian and Leila Javafshani, Ame Book Publishing(in Persian).
  • Tajik, Mohammadreza (2009), Semiotics; Theory and method, political science journal,No4(5). 7-39(in Persian).
  • Turkashund, Abbas and Ranjpour, Zohra (2016), Redefining an urban sign with a layered semiotics approach, the second international conference on art, architecture and applications (in Persian).