Study on the Characteristics of a Good Neighborhood in Tehran

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Assistant professor in Development Sociology, National Institute for Population Research

Abstract

Introduction: The concept of neighborhood and its perception have changed in big cities, especially in Tehran. Thus, both the geographical boundaries of former neighborhoods have changed and the importance and concept of neighborhood as a social center has lost its former position. Considering these changes, this study tries to find out how people perceive a good neighborhood today and what are the characteristics of this good neighborhood: When a neighborhood is not good or we do not live in a good neighborhood, two challenges arise: 1) neighborhood instability and 2) neighborhood disrespect, which reinforce each other. Neighborhood badness is manifested by, among other things, a lack of a sense of identity with and belonging to the neighborhood, a lack of participation and voluntary mobilization of human and financial resources and facilities, and the like. Therefore, understanding a good or desirable neighborhood is important for city managers and planners to consider citizens’ ideas, needs, and priorities in neighborhood preservation and development, and to enhance the attractiveness of urban neighborhoods for life and vitality. Also, by understanding the characteristics of a good neighborhood and its dimensions, it is possible to expansion urban development programs based on the material and mental needs of the neighborhood people. We believe that a good neighborhood is a place that provides vitality, quality of life, and a good standard of living, a place where one feels at home and belongs.  
Method: The methodological approach of this article is qualitative. Data are collected using interviews and observation techniques in eight Tehran neighborhoods named Kianshahr, Yaftaabad, Shemiran Neu, Karoun-e Shomali, Narmak-e Markazi, Bagh Feyz, Niavaran, and Saadataabad. Fifty-nine people participated in the study. The collected data were analyzed using the content analysis method.
Finding: The results of this study show that the characteristics of a good neighborhood include: “good and moral people”, “health and cleanliness in the neighborhood”, “recreational, cultural and sports facilities”, “easy access to essentials and public transportation”, “quietness and low population density in the neighborhood”, “presence of green areas, parks and good weather,” “architecture and good appearance of the neighborhood,” “no interference in others’ lifestyle,” “interaction and good relations with neighbors,” “absence of social problems/anomalies and enjoyment of social security and health,” and “a suitable educational environment for children.”
People see a good neighborhood as a place that has three important dimensions: “social health,” "suitable physical space and environment,” and “the opportunity to live and enjoy.”
Conclusion: A good neighborhood is very closely related to attachment. When it is a good neighborhood, the attachment to the neighborhood is naturally positive and high. It can be said that paying attention to the dimensions of a good neighborhood is important and crucial for a vital and sustainable city, as well as for a livable neighborhood for people, and should be seriously considered by urban planners and managers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Alaeddini, P., & Pourmirghaffari, M. (2018), Tehran’s Neighborhood Management and Sub-Councils: Assessing Urban Governance in Hassan-Abad-e Zargandeh. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 7(1): 25-52. (In Persian)
  • Alexander, K. D. (2020), Book Review: Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. Acta Sociologica, 63(1): 126-127.
  • Atak, S. (2020), the Impact of Urban Form on Urban Vitality: Comparative Analysis of Two Cases in Yenikale Neighborhood. MA Thesis in Urban Design, the Graduate School of İzmir Institute of Technology, 2020.
  • Bastani, S., & Nikzad, S. (2014), Personal Networks and Neighborhood Attachment in Tehran city:with emphasis on the role of modern communication mediums. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3(2): 193-219. (In Persian)
  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2).
  • Ebrahimzadeh, H., Hashem Zehi, N., Ashtari, A., & Mofarah, F. (2015), Social Factors Influencing the Iranians Belong to the Neighborhood (the Study Population: Tehran 22 area Residents over 18 Years Old). International Journal of urban and Rural Management, 13(37): 151-164. (In Persian)
  • Evans, P. B. (2002). Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Fakouhi, N. (2004), Urban Anthropology, Tehran: Ney Publications. (In Persian)
  • Farazmand, R., & Sohizadeh, M. (2014), Study and Analysis of Components Affecting on Vitality from the Perspective of Social Interactions in Evaluating the Performance of Urban Public Spaces (Case Study: Kermanshah Municipality Parking Area). Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 2 (6): 29-42. (In Persian)
  • Fazelian, M., & Ghasemi, M. (2014), Study the characteristics appropriate social spaces to create a sense of belonging to the neighborhood Case study: Region 2 of Tehran municipality. Urban Management Studies, 5(16): 57-70. (In Persian)
  • Flick, U. (2008), An introduction to qualitative research. Translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney Poblication. (In Persian)
  • Ghorbanpour, M., Zali, N., yourdkhani, M., & Azadeh, S. (2018), Evaluation of Effective Factors on Strengthening Vitality of Urban Walkways (Case Study: Alam-Al-Hoda Walkway in Rasht). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 13(1): 105-123. (In Persian)
  • Guest, (2012) AppliedThematic Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc,
  • Hahlweg, D. (1997). The City as a family. In S. H. Lennard, S. von Ungern Sternberg, H. L.
  • Hedayat, S., Hadyani, Z., Hajinezhad, A., & Asgari, A. (2019), Interdisciplinary Conceptual Urban Vitality (Examining Principles, Dimensions and Indicators). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 6(20): 75-107. (In Persian)
  • Khorasanizadeh, F., Saberi, H., Momeni, M., & Mousavi, M. (2020), Structural explanation of factors affecting vitality in urban public spaces of Isfahan from the view point of citizens and tourists. Geography and Planning, 24(72): 151-181. (In Persian)
  • Latifi, G., Jomepoor, M., & Gerivani, S. (2014), A comparative study of urban livability in neighborhoods case study: southern Majidieh and SaadatAbad, Tehran, Iran. International Journal of urban and Rural Management, 13(34): 27-40. (In Persian)
  • Lee, K. Y. (2021), Factors Influencing Urban Livability in Seoul, Korea: Urban Environmental Satisfaction and Neighborhood Relations, Journal of Social Sciences, 10: 138.
  • Mcmillan, D. W., Chavis, D. (1986), Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1): 6-23.
  • Mousavi Noor, S.A., Varesi, H.R., Mohammadi, J. (2016), Evaluation and Analysis of Livability Components of Tehran Metropolis, Geography (International and Scientific Journal of Iranian Geography Association), 14(51): 237-258. (In Persian)
  • Nemati, D., Zomorodian, A. H., Nouri Nia, H., Barghamadi, H., & Musanejad, P. (2013), Tehran's Neighborhood Research Guide. Tehran: Tisa publication. (In Persian)
  • Newman, P. W. G. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model.Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4): 219–226.
  • Norouzian-Maleki, S. et al. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators, 48: 263–271. (In Persian)
  • Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). City life: Rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110 (2), 433–451.
  • Rashidi Ebrahim Hesari, A., Movahed, A., Tavllaei, S., & Mousavi, M. N. (2016), Spatial Analysis of Tabriz Metropolitan Area with a Livability Approach. Journal of Geographic Space, 16 (54): 155-176. (In Persian)
  • Sasanpour, F., & Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2013), Principles and Characteristics of a Livable City. The First national conference on geography, urban planning and sustainable development, Koomesh Environmental Association, University of Aviation Industry.
  • Sasanpour, F., Tavallaei, S., & Jafari Asadabadi, H., (2014), Livability of Cities in Sustainable Urban Development Case Study: Tehran Metropolis. Geography (International and Scientific Journal of Iranian Geography Association), 12(42): 129-157. (In Persian)
  • Selezneva, E. (2011), Urban Vitality: Exploring the Centrality Conditions. University of Technology, department of Urbanism.
  • Serajzadeh, S. H. (2010), Typology (Clustering) of Tehran neighborhoods; Ten Clusters. The Deputy of Social and Cultural Affairs of Tehran Municipality. (In Persian)
  • Soleimani Mehrenjani, M., Tavallai, S., Rafieian, M., Zanganeh, A., & Khazaeinezhad, F. (2016), Urban livability: the concept, principles, aspects and parameters. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 4(1): 27-50. (In Persian)
  • Timmer, V., & Seymoar, N. K. (2005), The livable city. Vancouver working group discussionpaper, the world urban forum 2006. Vancouver: UN Habitat – International Centre for Sustainable Cities.
  • Zhan, D., Kwan, M.., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018), Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025