Women and constructing marital relationships in cyberspace (Case Study of Ni Ni Site Website Forum)

Authors

1 PhD student in Sociology, Alzahra University

2 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University

Abstract

 
Introduction: Along with the influence of social networks on people’s personal lives in recent decades, the dimensions and quality of family relationships have also undergone extensive and unprecedented changes. One of the most influential groups is women, who are experiencing a new form of social communication beyond traditional or cultural limitations. Currently, 72% of women use smartphones and their internet penetration is 42.7%. The website “NiniSite” deals specifically with topics and issues affecting women and has gained numerous users. The website has about 750,000 registered users and is visited by 800,000 people daily. While the gender of the users cannot be determined with certainty, based on the topics on the site, it can be assumed that more than 90% of these users are female. This study examines one of the site’s forums on the topic of “wives” to investigate how female users form marital relationships. The main research questions addressed key aspects, categories, couples’ positions, and the establishment or mitigation of gender stereotypes in relationships. The conceptual framework of the study was based on two approaches of constructivism in media (Stuart Hall) and cyberfeminism. Within Stuart Hall’s theory, culture is based on the ideology of the infrastructure of different readings of a meaning. He discusses two important strategies in the representational system: stereotyping and naturalization. Most cyberfeminist theorists agree that the Internet has promoted women’s agency and can raise public awareness by focusing on emancipation.
Methods: The method of the study is based on qualitative content analysis and time sampling was conducted in a period of one month (July to August) 2019.
Finding: The four main themes extracted include emotional and sexual, financial, family, and critical relationships. The results of the analysis show that emotional concerns are the most common topics of conversation among users and that there is a significant level of empathy and validation of shared experiences in this aspect of the relationship. At the same time, a significant amount of “generalization” and “stereotyping” is formed in this area. Women have shown the most evidence of agency and rethinking in sexual and financial relationships. The dominance of a discourse that can be called “sexual satisfaction” or “sexual orientation” has caused problems for women in its various dimensions. In the area of financial relationships, the desire for independence and personal purpose shows a clear shift in thinking from traditional ideas.
Conclusion: In areas related to social customs (e.g., marital commitment), family traditions (e.g., Iranian family-centered culture), and legal challenges (e.g., divorce and custody), the reproduction of gender stereotypes and compromises is more pronounced. Regarding critical relationships related to the occurrence of deadlocks in relationships, betrayal (or suspicion of betrayal) and violence (psychological, verbal, and physical) were very common, and (as with sexual relationships) the anonymity of users plays an important role in expressing them.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Asadpour, N. and Moqarrabi, E. (2015), “What is Cyber Feminism?”, Peivast Monthly, No.33: 8-9. )In Persian(
  • Bakhshi, B., Nasiri, B., Bakhtiari, A. and Taherian, M. (2013), “The Role and Function of Social Networks (Case Study of Kafe Mam Social Network, a Network for Mothers and Children)”, Women's Research Journal, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, No.3: 37-59. )In Persian(
  • Cadell, L. (2013), “Socially practical or practically unsociable? A study into social media policy experiences in Queensland cultural heritage institutions”, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, No. 44: 3-13.
  • Deeks, E. (2016), “The Agency of Anonymity: Reading Women`s Autobiographical Blogs”, Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Edge Hill University.
  • Dehghani, M. (2009), “Content analysis of elementary school social education books based on social skills according to teachers' perspectives”, Educational Innovations Quarterly, No. 31: 121-148. )In Persian(
  • Garcia Gomez, A. (2010), “Competing Narratives, Gender and Threaded Identity in Cyberspace”, Journal of Gender Studies, No. 1: 27-42.
  • Ghimire, A. and Samuels, Fiona. (2014), “Change and continuity in social norms and practices around marriage and education in Nepal”, Shaping policy for development, Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9181.pdf
  • Giddens, A. (2013), Abstract of Anthony Giddens's works, translated by: Hassan Chavoshian, second edition, Tehran: Ghoghnoos Publishing. )In Persian(
  • Hall, S. (2012), Meaning, Culture and Social Life, translated by: Ahmad Golmohammadi, Tehran: Ney Publishing. )In Persian(
  • Harcourt, W. (2001), “Rethinking Difference and Equality: women and the politics of places”, in places in an age of globalization, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: 649-675.
  • Karamollahi, N., and Dehghani, R. (2017), “The Basic Methodology of Stuart Hall Cultural Theory with a Critical Approach”, Quarterly Journal of Religion and Cultural Policy, No. 3: 130-155. )In Persian(
  • Khoshk Jan, Z., and Dabbaghi, H. (2017), “Meaning, Language and Identity in Social Constructivism as a Methodology”, Third International Conference on Psychology, Sociology, Educational Sciences and Social Studies. )In Persian(
  • Maines, D. (2000), "The Social Construction of Meaning, Contemporary Sociology" (Published By: American Sociological Association) No.3: 577-584.
  • Mehrdad, N., Haghdoost Oskooi, F., Seyyed Fatemi, N., Ebrahimi, H. and Rezaei, M. (2016), Qualitative content analysis, Tehran: Boshra Publishing. )In Persian(
  • Modiri, F. (2017), “A Study of Shared Activities with a Spouse and Its Relationship with the Sustainability of Marital Life”, Social Studies and Research in Iran, No 3: 475-494. )In Persian(
  • Mohammadi, N., Kianpour, M. and Aghababaei, E. (1397), “Cyberspace and redefining gender roles in the construction of feminine conflicts in Kurdish Facebook”, Women in Culture and Art, No. 1: 47-73. )In Persian(
  • Monadi, M. (2006), Family Sociology: Analysis of Everyday Life and Family Space, Tehran: Danjeh Publishing. )In Persian(
  • Nasiri, B. (2015), “A Look at the Challenges of Cyber Feminism from New Information Technologies”, Media Studies, No.29: 123-140. )In Persian(
  • Safiri, K. and Zakeri Hamaneh, R. (2014),” Building the concept of trust in a spouse in cyberspace (Case study: women living in Yazd)”, Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, No. 2: 1-30. )In Persian(
  • Sarwari Zargar, M. (2011), “Semiotics of Family Representation in Television Commercials”, Communication Research Quarterly, No. 3: 33-62. )In Persian(
  • Yazdkhasti, B., Adli, S. and Sepehri, A. (2013), “Content Analysis of Facebook Social Network Pages and Groups with Habermas Public Domain Theory”, Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 1: 87-110. )In Persian(
  • Zarandi, M., Hashemianfar, A. and Kianpour, Massoud. (2017), “Women and the Social Construction of Marital Commitment (Case Study: Isfahan)”, Culture Strategy, No. 38: 128-163. )In Persian(
  • Khajegiri, T. (2019), Interview with Mohammad Reza Rahmani, CEO of Nini site, https://shanbemag.com/conversation-with-executive-manager-ninisite/
  • Bakhshi pour, M. (2019), Age and gender of information technology users in Iran, http://mehrnews.com/xPDsp