The Relationship between Religiosity and Family Values with Fertility Desires and Intention among Married Women in Tehran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Kharazmi University

2 Professor of Demography, University of Tehran, Honorary Professor, University of Melbourne

3 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Kharazmi University

4 Master of Arts in Social Sciences, Kharazmi University

Abstract

Introduction: In addition to physiological factors, the determinants of fertility levels in different societies include various economic, social, political, environmental and cultural factors. The impact of these factors on fertility varies across different populations and subgroups. Thus, fertility and attitudes toward childbearing, are not only shaped by the economic factors and costs of parturition, but are also significantly affected by the cultural and societal factors.The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship between religiosity and family values, ​​with childbearing desires and intentions among married women in Tehran.
Method: The research is based on a survey conducted among a sample of 398 married women using multi-stage stratified sampling method in Tehran. In this study, religiosity and its dimensions (belief, ritual, experiential, consequential) have been analyzed according to the Glock and Stark measure and family values using Inglehart's theory in two aspects of traditional (material) and modern (metamaterial) values.
Finding: The results showed that mean number of children ever born for women in this study is 1.58 children and the ideal average fertility is 1.95 children. Around 74 percent of women in the study did not intend to give birth to another child, while nearly 40 percent of women considered only one child as ideal. The results of bivariate analysis showed no significant relationship between religiosity and its dimensions with fertility desires, but religiosity can affect women’s fertility intentions. Also, family values ​​are significantly associated with fertility tendencies and intentions. The results of path analysis showed that family value variables (beta coefficient of 0.243) was the sole significant proximate determinant of fertility desires. Age and socio-economic status while directly affecting desires to have children, influenced fertility ideals through religiosity and family values indirectly. Logistic Regression analysis revealed that religiosity and family values had significant impact on intentions in having children but there was no relationship with The results of logistic regression showed variables of religiosity and family values has a significant relationship with fertility intention but the relationship between the socioeconomic status and fertility intention was not significant.  Finally, it can be said women's fertility behaviors are influenced by the socio-economic, cultural and demographic context of society.
Conclusion: Religiosity and family values as a social and cultural structure play a decisive role in the formation of reproductive behaviors. Fertility behavior as the most important variable of population dynamics is a multifaceted issue and a wide variety of economic, social, and cultural factors influence fertility through complex mechanisms. Therefore, it is vital to identify determinants of fertility behavior in order to design appropriate policies in the country. Government policies must also be in line with the desires and interests of women and families.

Keywords

References

  • Abbasi Shavazi, M. J., and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2013), Fertility Trend and Level During the Last Four Decades In Iran: Application of the Own-Children Method in Estimating Fertility Using The 1986 And 2011 Censuses, Research Report, Statistics Research Institute, Statistics Center of Iran. (In Persian)
  • Abbasi Shavazi, M. J., and McDonald, P. (2008), Family Change in Iran: Religion, Revolution, and the State, in International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives, Jayakody, R., Thornton, A., and Axinn, W. (Eds.), Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY 10016.
  • Ahmadzadeh, R., and Ghasemi, T. (2013), A Study of the Role of Internet on Family Values (Case Study: Youth in District 15 of Tehran). Media Studies, No. 23: 59–72.
  • Akram, R., Sarker, A. R., Sheikh, N., Ali, N., Mozumder, M., and Sultana, M. (2020), Factorsassociated with Unmet Fertility Desire and Perceptions of Ideal Family Size among Women in Bangladesh: Insights from a Nation Wide Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS ONE, No. 15: 97–134.
  • Barbalet, J. (2008), Weber, Passion and Profits (The PretestantEthic and the Spirit of Capitalism in Context), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baudin, T. (2015), Religion and Fertility: the French Connection. Demographic Research, No. 2: 397–420.
  • Beck, U., and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002), Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Bernardes, J. (2011), An Introduction to Family Studies, Translated by: H. Ghazian, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  • Bessey, D. (2018), “Religion and Fertility in East Asia: Evidence from the East Asian Social Survey”. Pacific Economic Review, No. 23: 517–532.
  • Bryce, N., Camp, R., and Salangar, R. (2011), Analysis of Psychological Data with SPSS Program, 3rd Edition, Tehran: Doran.
  • Erfani, A., and Shojaei, J. (2015), “Proximate Determinants of Fertility Intentions in Tehran, Iran”. Journal of Population Association of Iran, No. 10, 164–186. (In Persian)
  • Fahlén, S., and Oláh, L. (2010), Female Employment, Work Hours and Childbearing Intentions in Sweden in the Early 2000s: A Capability Perspective. Stockholm University: Stockholm Research Reports in Demography.
  • Ferjka, T., and Westoff, C. (2006), “Religion, Religiousness and Fertility in the U.S.A and in Europe'”. Maxplanck Institute for Demographic Research, No. 4: 10–25.
  • Ghanbari Barzian, A., and Dervish, M. (2017), “Investigating the Effect of Cyberspace Consumption on Religiosity and Family Values-a Case Study of Isfahan”. Sociology of Life Style, No. 8: 219–254. (In Persian)
  • Goldscheider, C. (2006), “Religion, Family, and Fertility: What Do We Know Historically and Comparatively?” In Renzo Derosas and Frans van Poppel (Eds.), Religion and the Decline of Fertility in the Western World, No. 7: 41–57.
  • Heyford, S. R., and Morgan, S. P. (2008), “Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions”. Sociology Forces, No. 86: 1188–1166.
  • Hosseini, H (2006), Ethnicity and Reproduction: Explaining the Reproductive Behaviors of Kurdish and Turkish Women in Urmia, PhD Thesis in Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Hosseini, H (2013), Socio-Economic Demography and Family Planning, 4th Edition, Hamadan: Bu-Ali Sina University Press. (In Persian)
  • Hosseini, H., and Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2008), “Changes in Thought and Its Impact on the Behavior and Reproductive Ideals of Kurdish and Turkish Women”. Women in Development and Politics, No. 2: 84–55. (In Persian)
  • Inglehart, R. (2012), Cultural Transformation in the Advanced Industrial Society, Translated by M. Veter, 2nd Edition, Tehran: Kavir.
  • Inglehart, R., and Pita, N. (2016), Religion and Politics in the Sacred and Customary World, Translated by M. Veter, Tehran: Kavir.
  • Jeffery, P., and Jeffery, R. (2000), “Religion and Fertility in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, No. 35: 3253–3259.
  • Kalantari, S., Rabbani, R., and Octave, R. (2005), “Study of Social, Economic and Cultural Factors Affecting Fertility with Emphasis on the Role of Family Planning in Isfahan”. Shushtar Azad University, No. 7: 107–150. (In Persian)
  • Kavehfirouz, Z., Zare, B., and Shamsedini, H. (2016), “The Effect of Life Style Dimension on Attitudes towards Childbearing among Married Women in Tehran City”. Women in Development and Politics, No. 14: 217–234. (In Persian)
  • König, S. (2011), “Higher Order Births in Germany and Hungary: Comparing Fertility Intentions in a National Context”. Sozialforschung MZES Mannheim, No. 6: 1–18.
  • Labibi, M. (2013), A New Approach to the Evolution of Family Values in Iran, Social Science Month Book, No. 61: 32–39 (In Persian)
  • Lucas, D., and Meyer, P. (2013), An Introduction to Population Studies, Translated by H. Mahmoudian, Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Mahmoudian, H., and Nobakht, R. (2010), “Religion and Reproduction: Analysis of Reproductive Behavior of Sunni and Shiite Religious Groups in Goledar, Fars Province”. Iranian Social Issues Quarterly, No. 1: 195–215. (In Persian)
  • Mahmoudiani, S., and Shahriari, S. (2015), “Religion and Development Roles in Fertility Behavior among Kurdish Women in Iran”. Sientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, No. 20: 91–100. (In persian)
  • McClelland, D. (1987), The Achieving Society. Totawa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.
  • Miettinen, A., and Paajanen, P. (2003), “Value Orientions and Fertility Intentions of finnish men and women”, Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, No39: 201-226.
  • Miller, W. B. (2010), Fertility intentions, counterintentions, and subintentions – Atheoretical framework and graphic model, Unpublished, Retrieved from
  • http://www.tfri.org/TFRI.org/TFRI Unpublished_ Papers _files
  • Miller, W. B. (2011), “Differences between Fertility Desires and Intentions: Implications for Theory, Research and Policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, No. 9: 75–98.
  • Mohammadi, M., and Rastergarkhaled, A. (2015), Cultural Changes, and Reduce Fertility in Iran (Based on Second Analyze of Data of Iranianâ™s Survey Values and Attitudes). Journal of Applied Sociology, No. 26: 159–180. (In Persian)
  • Ojaghlo, S., and Saraie, H. (2014), A study of Temporal Changes of Child Value in Iran (Zanjan City Womans). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 3: 261–283. (In Persian)
  • Adongo, P. B., Phillips, J. F., and Binka, F. N. (1998), “The Influence of Traditional Religion on Fertility Regulation among the KassenaNankana of Northern Ghana”. Population Council, No. 4: 1–23.
  • Preda, M., Mareci, A., Tudoricu, A., Taloș, A. M., Bogan, E., Lequeux-Dincă, A. I., and Vijulie, I. (2020), “Defining the Concept of Family through the Lens of Fertile-Aged Women in Bucharest, Romania—between Traditionalism and Inclusion”. Sustainability, No 12: 2691.
  • Rajabi Rostami, M. (2012), Study of the Effect of Secularism on Fertility in Iran, Master Thesis in Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Rezaeinasab, Z., and Fotoohi, S. (2017), “Socio-cultural Factors Influencing the Fertility of Married Women (49–15) in Ilam City”. Ilam Culture Scientific and Promotional Quarterly, No. 18: 112–133. (In Persian)
  • Retherford, R. D., Ogawa, N., and Sakamoto, S. (1996), “Values and Fertility Change in Japan”. Population Studies, No. 50: 5–25.
  • Roche, G. (2012), The Sociology of Talcott Parsons, Translated by A. Nikgohar, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  • Saeedi Madani, S., Karimi, H., Jalilian, A., and Armand, M. A. (2015), “Determinants of Reproductive Behavior of Women in Shiite and Sunni Religious Groups”. Cultural and Educational Quarterly of Women and Family, No. 11: 71–97. (In Persian)
  • Sagone, E., and De Caroli, M. E. (2014), “The Portrait of Values in Family: A Cross-Age Study in Sicilian Context”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 12: 194–198.
  • Sarai, H. (2015), “Time and Time Again in This Work”. Journal of Population Association of Iran, No. 2: 60–37. (In Persian)
  • Saraie, H., and Ojaghloo, S. (2013), “The Generational Study of Marriage Value Change in Iran (Case of Study: Women in Zanjan City)”. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, No. 5: 19–42. (In Persian)
  • Sarukhani, B., and Rifatajah, M. (2013), “Sociological Factors Affecting the Redefinition of Women’s Social Identity”. Women’s Research, No. 1: 71–91. (In Persian)
  • Shojaei Zand, A. (2005), “A Model for Measuring Religiosity in Iran”. Iranian Journal of Sociology, No. 1: 66–34. (In Persian)
  • Shojaei, J., and Yazdkhasti, B. (2017), “A Systematic Review of Studies of Fertility Decline in the Last Two Decades”. Women’s Strategic Studies, No. 19: 137–159. (In Persian)
  • Serajzadeh, H., and Pouyafar, M. R. (2017), “Religion and Social Order: A Study of the Relationship between Religiosity and Feelings of Anomie and Perversion among a Sample of Students”. Social Issues of Iran, No. 63: 71–105. (In Persian)
  • Soroush, M., and Bahrani, S. (2012), The Relationship between Religiosity, Attitudes toward Gender Roles and Attitudes Toward Children with the Real and Desirable Number of Children. Woman in Development and Politics, No. 2: 189–208. (In Persian)
  • Statistics Center of Iran (2015), Results of the General Census of Population and Housing, Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Torabi, F., Askari Nodooshan, A., and Ali-Mandegari, M. (2017), Changes in Marriage and Family in Iran. Journal of Population Association of Iran, No. 4: 55–74. (In Persian)
  • Vogl, T. S., and Freese, J. (2020), “Differential Fertility Makes Society More Conservative on Family Values”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, No. 117: 7696–7701.
  • Wilson, M., and McClelland, D. (1987), “The Time Course of Perceptual Choice: The Leaky, Competing Accumulator Model”. Psychological Review, No. 3: 550–592.
  • Zang, L. (2008), “Religious Affiliation, Religiosity and Male and Female Fertility”, Demographic Research, No. 18: 233–262.
  • Zhairinia, M., and Azadarmaki, T. (2015), “Value Orientation and its Relationship with Economical and Social Changes in Bandar-Abbas City”. Quarterly Journal of Socio-Ciltural Development Studies, No. 3: 135–153. (In Persian)

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics