Gender and Habitual Differentiation: A Comparative Study of Perception and Experience of Men and Women When Divorcing (Case Study: Tabriz)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, University of Tabriz and Member of the Scientific Center for Health Sociology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Master of Sociology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Divorce as a social issue can cause many different issues and consequences and sometimes many other social harms at the individual and social levels. These effects and consequences can have consequences for both men and women and on the other hand for children. Divorced couples seem to have an identity crisis and do not have the ability to give meaning to life and achieve success and satisfaction in living together, and people who are determined to divorce, in the difficulty and deadlock of living together, know the final solution to solve the problem, save and re-meaning life and separation. According to what has been said, the present study tries to compare and examine the understanding of women and men in the face of divorce with an interpretive approach and to address the underlying and causal factors as well as the consequences of divorce in the lives of men and women.
Method: The method used in this study is qualitative and based on this, grounded theory has been used as a guide for interviewing and analyzing the resulting qualitative data. The study population consists of divorced men and women living in Tabriz. According to the present method, sampling continued until a kind of theoretical and information saturation was obtained and in the process of data collection, no new information was obtained during further interviews. The number of people interviewed (sample) in this study was 32 (17 women and 15 men divorced or divorced). In the present study, in-depth interview technique was used to collect data.
Finding: According to the present study, the causal conditions in the formation of divorce are violence, infidelity and unrestrained sexual-moral burden, sexual dissatisfaction, high-risk marriages, addiction, family differences and attitudes, economic issues, early marriage. Underlying conditions such as the weakness of the education system and counseling centers before marriage and during divorce affect causal conditions. Interfering conditions in male and female divorce also included poor management and lack of personality independence, individualism, reduced divorce ugliness, normative pressures, lack of commitment and responsibility, and domination and control over the other party. Strategies used during divorce, including the support or lack of material and spiritual support of the family, the use of dowry as a lever of pressure and the non-functioning of this lever, saving, supporting or not supporting the law and hot stigma. The consequences of divorce for both men and women include reduced social relationships, the suggestion of illegitimate relationships, the formation of a single-parent family, sexual marginalization, lack of strong economic support, and depression and mental disorders.
Conclusion: A comparative study of the understanding of divorce between divorced men and women shows a kind of social atmosphere in which we see a kind of class-cultural distinction in the "habit of capitalism and capitalism." The habit of couples is different and different from each other and they do not have the same social status and have different economic, cultural, social and symbolic capitals. In the present study, we saw that divorce patterns are no longer influenced by the cultural norms of society, and we are somehow faced with breaking the ugliness of divorce and normalizing divorce, such as marriage in society. However, divorce, in our society, despite its ugliness and with a great impact on the lives of people, especially women, can still be considered as the last shot in the butt. Divorced people after a period of time and the emotions and shocks caused by divorce subside more rationally are able to talk about how to get married, cohabitation, the causes of divorce and its consequences, and you can use their experiences and views to understanding the reality of life and divorce benefited.

Keywords


  • Akhavan Tafti, M. (2003), “Divorce Stages and Aftermaths”, Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological, No. 3: 125-157. (In Persian)
  • Dommaraju, P. (2016), “Divorce and Separation in India”, Population and Development Review, No. 2: 195–223.
  • Fatehi Dehaghani, A., and Nazari, A. M. (2011), “Sociological Analysis of Factors Contributing to Couples’ Tendency toward Divorce in Isfahan Province”, Journal of Societal Security Studies, No. 25: 13–54. (In Persian)
  • Gonzalez, L., and Viitanen, T. (2009), “The Effect of Divorce Laws on Divorce Rates in Europe”, European Economic Review, No. 2: 127–138.
  • Lesthaege, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review, No. 2: 211–251.
  • Report on the Situation of Women and the Family in the Mirror of Statistics During the Years 2011–2017, Available via the official website of the Vice President for Women and Family Affairs at:

http://women.gov.ir/uploads/images/gallery/ejtemaee/mostanad/ayene.pdf

  • Sadeghi Fasaei, S., and Esari, M. (2012), “Gender Analysis of Life after Divorce: A Qualitative Study”, Women in Development and Politics, No. 3: 5-30. (In Persian)
  • Sayer, L. C., and Bianchi, S. M. (2000), “Women’s Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce: A Review and Reexamination”, Journal of Family, No. 21: 906–943.
  • Sheikhi, Kh., Khosravi, J., Gharibi, H., Gholizadeh, Z., and Hosseinzadeh, M. (2012), “Semantic Understanding of Divorce and Discovery of Its Positive Consequences (Qualitative Study)”, Journal of Psychotherapy and Family Counseling, No. 2: 64–78. (In Persian)
  • Zargar, F., Neshat Doost, H. M. (2007), “A Study of Effective Factors in the Incidence of Divorce in Falavarjan”, Family Research, No. 3: 737–749. (In Persian)
  • Abbaszadeh, M., Saeidi Ataei, H., and Afshari, Z. (2015), “A Study of Some Modernity’s Factors Effective on Women’s Tendency toward Divorce (Research Subjects: Married Women in Zanjan)”, Strategic Research of Social Problems in Iran, No. 1: 25–44. (In Persian)
  • Abdi, A. (2014), An Introduction to Research in Family Sociology in Iran. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Abebe, Y. M. (2015), Lived Experiences of Divorced Women in Rural Ethiopia; a Special Focus in Hulet Ejju Enessie Woreda: Addis Zemen Kebele.
  • Afrasiabi, H., and Dehghani Daramroud, R. (2016), “Contexts and Encountering with Emotional Separation among Women in City of Yazd”, Women in Development and Politics, No. 2: 255–271. (In Persian)
  • Amato, P. R., and Rogers, S. J. (1997), “A Longitudinal Study of Marital Problems and Subsequent Divorce”, Journal of Marriage and Family, No. 3: 612–624.
  • Bernardes, J. (2005), An Introduction to Family Studies, Translated by Hossein Ghazian, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Clark Stewart, A., and Brentano, C. (2006), Divorce: Causes and Consequences, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Foroutan, Y., and Mirzaee, S. (2017), “Attitudes towards Divorce and Its Determinants in Iran”, Iranian Population Studies, No. 2: 193–225. (In Persian)
  • Ghazi Tabatabai, M., and Ali Mandgari, M. (2012), “Underlying Contexts of Divorce and Its Impact on Changes in the Family Institution in Tehran: A Qualitative Study Using of the Grounded Theory”, Journal of the Iranian Demographic Association, No. 13: 24-72. (In Persian).
  • Ghoreishi, F., Shirmohammadi, D., and Borjvand, A. (2012), “Understanding the Causes of Divorce from the Perspective of Men and Women at Risk of Divorce and Divorce (Case Study of Saqqez)”, Strategic Research of Security & Social Order, No. 1: 19–30. (In Persian)
  • Giddens, A. (2007), Sociology, Translated by M. Sabouri, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Goodarzi, M. (2011), Values and Socio-cultural Attitudes of Tehran Citizens. Tehran: Tehran Office of Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian)
  • Javadi, A. M., and Javadi, M. (2011), “Tendency to Divorce and the Factors Affecting It among Those Who Refer to Family Courts in Ivan Gharb and Gilan Gharb”, Second National Conference on Social Injuries of Iran, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Iranian Sociological Association. (In Persian)
  • Monadi, M. (2007), Sociology of the Family: Analysis of Everyday Life and the Space of Family), Tehran: Danjeh Publications. (In Persian)
  • Multafat, H., and Ahmadi, H. (2007), “Study of Factors Affecting Couples’ Tendency to Divorce (Case Study of Darab County)”, Journal of the Iranian Demographic Association, No. 5: 152–168. (In Persian)
  • Nasiri, M. (2003), “Poverty and Geography of Divorce in Tehran”, Strategic Studies of Women, No. 26: 82-112. (In Persian)
  • Qutbi, M., Holakouee Naeini, K., Jazayeri, A., and Rahimi, A. (2003), “The Situation of Divorce and Some Factors Affecting It in People Living in Dolatabad”, Social Welfare, No. 3: 272-287. (In Persian)
  • Riahi, M. E., Alivardinia, A., and Bahrami Kakavand, S. (2008), “Sociological Analysis of the Tendency towards Divorce (Case Study of Kermanshah)”, Women in Development and Politics, No. 3: 109–140. (In Persian)
  • Roshani, Sh. (2010), “Emotional Divorce: Contexts and Consequences”, Master Thesis, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Sadr al-Ashrafi, M., Khonakdar Tarsi, M., Shamkhani, A., and Yousefi Afrashteh, M. (2012), “Pathology of Divorce (Causes and Factors)”, Journal of Cultural Engineering, No. 73: 26–53. (In Persian)
  • Segalan, M. (2001), Historical Sociology of the Family, Translated by H. Eliassy, Tehran: Markaz Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Seidman, S. (2013), Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. Translated by H. Jalili, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Seif, S. (2004), “A Comparative Study of the Consequences of Divorce in Iranian and American Divorced Men and Women”, Family and Research, No. 1: 81–104. (In Persian)
  • Teachman, J. (2010), “Wives’ Economic Resources and Risk of Divorce”, Journal of Family Issues, No. 10: 1305–1323.
  • Zarean, M., and Sadidpoor, S. (2017), “A Meta-analysis of Divorce-related Research: Individual vs. Social Factors”, Iranian Journal of Social Problem, No. 2: 191–218. (In Persian)