Sociological study of the evolution of lovemaking patterns among married residents of Ardabil city (1398)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Phd student in sociology, Payam Noor university,Tehran,Iran

2 Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, Payam Noor university, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Payam Noor university, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The current article has studied the evolution of lovemaking patterns in human relationships. The fundamental changes in the social, economic, cultural and political dimensions of Iranian society in recent decades have led to a fundamental change in the patterns of lovemaking of individuals, even in its most intimate form. Significant changes have occurred in romantic relationships between individuals. The formation of riots and tensions between spouses, increasing divorce rates and the increasing prevalence of concepts such as understanding, mutual interest, emotional divorce, infidelity, polygamy, casual love, fleeting relationships, etc. indicate a change in the patterns of lovemaking that traditional practices of romantic relationships, Has faced a serious challenge.
Method: This research has been carried out qualitatively and the grounded theory method has been used as the research method. and the of data collection method was document study, depth exploratory interviews with 41 married people According to the theoretical sampling presented in Ardabil city awhose narratives had been analyzed in lovemaking. The validity of current study was reviewed and confirmed by the interviewees and then expert professors. To analyze the data, continuous comparison method was used during the open, axial and selective coding stage. The results of the research are analyzed based on five axes that are the main factor in the evolution and three processes of the lovemaking pattern.
Finding: The analysis indicate that factors of the spread of modernism, technology development, individualization, apostasy and increment of the level of education, as well as intervening factors of diversity and increment leisure and urbanization and the expansion of cyberspace on the core phenomenon of fragmentation of love and subsequent change in behavior and The evolution of lovemaking has affected and transformed the Iranian family and the formation of new forms of relationships. In the research process, 9 varius patterns of lovemaking were identified, which are: 1) Traditional lovemaking (behind the scenes, patriarchal) 2) Romantic lovemaking 3) Friendly lovemaking 4) Realistic lovemaking 5) Erotic lovemaking 6) Sacrific lovemaking 7) Pure lovemaking 8)Playful lovemaking And 9) Liquid lovemaking.
Results & Conclusion: Numerous causal, underlying and moderating factors have led to the evolution of lovemaking patterns in the study community. The evolution of the patterns of lovemaking is such that the more we move from the past and traditional and contemporary behaviors, the more romantic acts of fluidity, instability, multiplicity and diversity. Each of these patterns is represented by distinct features. In the traditional pattern of lovemaking, expressing love in public is considered ugly and shameful, far from chastity and even disrespectful, and romantic acts become an "extra-secret" act and are exiled to the social scene. Also, more obedient women are in fact submissive and a tool to meet the sexual needs of men. Romantic lovemaking is associated with romantic behaviors that are strongly expressed and appearance, appearance, beauty, mutual understanding are important, and sometimes one-sided sacrifices occur in this type of lovemaking pattern. Playful lovemaking is a clear manifestation of secrecy and dishonesty, and friendly lovemaking means the preference of friendship before marriage in the formation of lovemaking. Logical aspects such as job, morality and behavior of the individual and parents, being good and having inherited and cultural commonalities are important in realistic lovemaking. Erotic lovemaking emerges with the characteristics of lover focus on lover, sense of ownership over lover, and intense sexual need. Instead, sacrificing love is characterized by self-sacrifice for one's spouse, enduring hardships and pain for the sake of one's spouse. Prioritizing the emotional satisfaction of spouses, expressing interest through receiving gifts, direct expression of love and affection and a sympathetic attitude in the absence of mutual interest and other issues, are the distinctive features of pure lovemaking with other patterns. Finally, liquid lovemaking implies its hobby, the importance of money, the formation of playfulness in relationships, extramarital sex experiences, and the formation of unstable virtual relationships have shaped the new pattern of lovemaking. Numerous emotional and sexual relationships with different people, the importance of money and material in relationships, temporary and casual friendships, the dominance of virtual relationships, the development of extramarital relationships and the performance of love as a playful phenomenon show the formation of relationships. The figure has somehow caused the fragmentation of lovemaking and the consequent fundamental consequences, including the transformation of the family as well as the transformation of the social situation.

Keywords


  • Afari (Pir Nazar), J. (1997), “Transition through the Rock and Vortex: The Transformation of the Role of Men and Women in Twentieth Century Iran”, Iran Nameh, No. 59: 365-388. (In Persian)
  • Afary, J. (2009), Sexual Politics in Modern Iran, New York: Cambridge University Press. (In Persian)
  • Ahmadi, E. et al., (2015), “The Impact of Facebook Social Network on Family Values ​​in Tabriz High School”, Social Development Quarterly, No. 4: 107-134. (In Persian)
  • Alipoor, P., Zahedi Mazandarani, M., Maleki, A., & Javadi Yeganeh, M. (2017), “Analysis of Gender Justice Discourse in the Sixth Five-Year Plan for Economic, Cultural and Social Development of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 2: 203-229. (In Persian)
  • Azad Armaki, T. (2007), Sociology of the Iranian Family, Tehran: Samat. (In Persian)
  • Bashiri Khatibi, B. et al., (2019), “Study of the Sociology of Youth Abstraction”, Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 4: 879-906. (In Persian)
  • Bashirieh, H. (1993), “Unification, Monotheism, Historical Dialectics and Issues of Political Development in Iran”, Development Culture, No. 17: 2-6. (In Persian)
  • Bashirieh, H. (1995), “Sociology of Modernity”, Journal of Criticism and Opinion, No. 1: 136. (in Persian)
  • Bastani, S. et al., (2011), “Consequences of Emotional Divorce and Coping Strategies”, Family Research, No. 26: 241-251. (In Persian)
  • Bauman, S. (2015), Liquid Love, Translated by Erfan Sabeti, Tehran: Gognus Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Bauman, Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridg: Polity Press.
  • Beck, U. (1992) “From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Environment”, Theory, Culture and Society, No. 9: 97-123. (In Persian)
  • Beck, U. (1994), “The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization”, in U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (Ed.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradiyion and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, (PP. 263-265), Combridge: Polity Press.
  • Beck, U. (2009), Society at Global Risk, Translated by Mohammad Reza Mehdizadeh, Tehran: Kavir Publications. (In Persian)
  • Beck, U., and Beck–Gernsheim, E. (1995), The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Behnam, J. (1978), Family and Kinship in Iran, Tehran: Kharazmi. (In Persian)
  • Behnam, J. (2002), Family, Education and Culture, Translated by Sadegh Adineh and Ali Asadi, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (In Persian)
  • Behnam, J. (2003), “Modernity, Modernization and Modernity”, Book of the Month of Social Sciences, No. 67 & 68: 8-17. (In Persian)
  • Blaki, N. (1993), Social Research Strategies, Translated by Hashem Aghabigpour, Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian)
  • Burnat, B. (2019), “Love Is a Physiological Motivation (Like Hunger, Thirst, Sleep or Sex)”, Journal of Medical Hypotheses, No. 129: 1-14.
  • Castells, M. (1996), Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture, Translated by Hassan Chavoshian, Tehran: New Plan. (In Persian)
  • Creswell, J. W. (1945), Qualitative Dynamics and Research Design: A Choice between Five Approaches (Narrative Research, Phenomenology), Translated by Hassan Danaeifard and Hossein Kazemi, Tehran: Saffar Ishraqi. (In Persian)
  • Dyer, D. (2005), Psychology of Love (Interpersonal Relationships), Tehran: Ney Negar. (In Persian)
  • Fakouhi, N. (2011), Development and Applied Anthropology, Tehran: Afkar. (In Persian)
  • Farasatkhah, M. (2019), Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences with Emphasis on "Based Theory" (Grounded Theory, GTM), Tehran: Agah Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Flick, O. (2006), An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Flora, W. (2010), The Social History of Sexual Relations in Iran, Translated by Mohsen Minoo Kherad, Sweden: Ferdowsi Publications. (In Persian)
  • Foucault, M. (2004), The Will to Know,Translated by Niko Sarkhosh and Afshin Jahanideh, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Foucault, M. (2011), The History of Madness in the Classical Age, Translated by Fatemeh Valiani, Tehran: Hermes Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Ghasemi, M. (2009), “Sociology of Risk and Its Importance for Risky Society”, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, No. 12: 27-47. (In Persian)
  • Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Translated by Mohsen Thalasi, Tehran: Markaz Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Personalization, Society and Personal Identity in the New Age, Translated by Nasser Movafghian, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2003), Sociology, Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Giddens, A., and Bardsal, K. (2003), Sociology, Translated by Hassan Chavoshian, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Goodarzi, M. (2015), “Women's Attitudes Towards Family Norms and Gender Awareness: An Analysis of the Findings of National Surveys”,in Report on the Social Status of Women in Iran, (PP: 179-196), Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (In Persian)
  • Goode, W. J. (1959), “The Theoretical Importance of Love”, American Sociological Review, No. 24: 38-47.
  • Gordon, S. L. (1981), “The Sociology of Sentiments and Emotions”, in M. Rosenberg and R. Turner (Ed.), Psychology, Social Perspectives, (PP. 340-354), New York: Basic Books.
  • Haj Mohammadi, F., and Haj Mohammadi, S. (2017), “Ethical Effects of Using Cyberspace on Marital Bond and Children's Relationships in the Family”, Quarterly Journal of Ethics, No. 28: 209-224. (In Persian)
  • Illouz, E. (1997), Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, London: University of California Press.
  • Imani, M. (2012), “Causes of Emotional Divorce, Its Consequences and Methods of Dealing with It”, Payvand, No. 393, 394 and 395: 21-27. (In Persian)
  • Lee, J. A. (1973), Colours of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving, Toronto: New Press.
  • Najmabadi, A. (2005), Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards: Gender and Sexual Anxieties of Iranian Modernity, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (In Persian)
  • National Registration Organization (2003-2005), Statistical Yearbooks of the National Registration Organization, Tehran: Bureau of Statistics and Demographic Information and Immigration.
  • Paidar, P. (1995), Women and the Political Process in Twentieth-Century Iran, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (In Persian)
  • Pakizegi, B. (1978), “Legal and Social Positions of Iranian Women”,in L. Beck and N.Keddie (Ed.), Women in the Muslim World (PP.216-227), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Parvin, S. et al., (2012), “Sociological Factors Affecting Emotional Divorce among Tehran Families”, Women Leadership Study, No. 56: 119-153. (In Persian)
  • Rabiee, A. (2001), Sociology of Value Changes in Iran, A Look at Voters' Behavior on June 2, 1997, Tehran: Culture and Thought. (In Persian)
  • Rafipour, F. (2001), Development and Conflict, Tehran: Anteshar Co. (In Persian)
  • Ritzer, G., and Goodman, J. (2011), Modern Sociological Theory, Translated by Khalil Mirzaei and Abbas Lotfizadeh, Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian)
  • Roca, J., and Begonya, E. (2015), “Love and its Transformations”, in B. Enguix and J. Roca, (Ed.) Rethinking Romantic Love (PP. 27-297), Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Seyed Saadati, F. (2013), “Protection of Privacy in Cyberspace Based on Islamic Norms”, Journal of Cultural Strategy, No. 23: 155-183. (In Persian)
  • Sternberg, R. et al., (1988), The Psychology of Love, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Strauss, A., and Carbin, J. (1990), Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Stages of Production of Underlying Theory, Translated by Ebrahim Afshar, Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian).