Studying Students’ Perceptions of Single Life; A Comparison of Genders

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jisr.2025.388792.1578

Abstract

The main purpose of the research is to analyze the gender comparison of students’ attitudes toward solitary life and its effective cultural and social factors.
 The current study is implemented in a quantitative method and is a paradigm and deductive strategy. The questionnaire instrument was employed to gather information and data. A research sample of 300 individuals from Kharazmi University has been selected using Cochran's general formula. Using backup theories, eight social and cultural variables were identified as prospective variables that could influence attitudes toward single life.
In general, the results of the study indicated that girls have a more negative attitude toward solitary life than boys. In other words, the desire to marry is greater among girls than among boys. The most significant variable with an increased and immediate and predictive and predictive attitude to single life is the adherence to family values, with a beta coefficient of 0.350, in the case of factors affecting the attitude of single life among girls, and individualism variables with a beta coefficient of 0.322 in the case of boys. However, in the model analysis model, other variables demonstrate that adherence to religious doctrines, which includes significant and reducing variables in both groups, is associated with positive attitudes toward biological abstraction. On the other hand, increased use of social networks has a greater impact on the positive tendency to biological abstraction, which suggests a lack or weakness in cultural policy-making.
Enhancing the quality of life and increasing awareness and skills in the areas of policymaking, strategy, and action by leveraging religious and familial values to fortify all forms of social support.

Keywords


Apostolou, M., Michaelidou, E. (2022), Why people prefer to be single: Voluntary singlehood and experiences with relationships. Studia Psychologica: Theoria et Praxis, 22(1), 27–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/sp.2022.22.2.03
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
Bianchi, S. M. (2014). Family change and time allocation in American families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 908-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716211413731
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women’s and men’s social roles and the evolution of gender stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1251-1262. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0146167200262001
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
Giddens, A. (2017). Sociology. Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Goode, W. J. (1963).World Revolution and Family Patterns. The Free Press.
Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282806777212350
Goud, W. (2000). Trust and social capital: The role of social networks in the formation of trust. Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 123-145.
Goud, W. (1990). The social context of trust: A sociological perspective. In: Trust and Social Capital”. New York: Academic Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.
Kimmel, M. S. (2011). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. Harper Collins.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253-286). Academic Press.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211-251.
Nikbakhsh, B., & Saki, R. (2023). A sociological examination of the factors influencing young people's attitudes towards cohabitation. Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22067/social.2023.80178.1280 (In Persian)
Nikkhah, H., Fani, M., & Asgharpour Masouleh, A. (2017). Measuring students' attitudes towards marriage and the influencing factors. Applied Sociology: Research Journal of Humanities, Isfahan University, 28(3), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2017.21711 (In Persian)
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001
Saraei, H., & Ojaghloo, S. (2013). A generational study of changing marriage values in Iran: A case study of women in Zanjan. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 5(4), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2014.53139 (In Persian)
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700107
Tajbakhsh, G., & Mohammadi, H. (2020). An analysis of the reasons for young people's inclination towards single life and their disaffection with marriage. Journal of Population, 27(111-112), 113-133. (In Persian)
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Theories of fertility decline: A review. Population Studies, 41(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x