Analysis of Factors Influencing People's Coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic with Special Reference to Religiosity and Social Indifference

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Humanities and Social Science, University of Farhangian

2 PhD in Economic Sociology and Development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: As an unprecedented crisis, the Corona virus outbreak has upset many current aspects of human life in a very sudden and widespread way. This highly contagious disease, more than any other epidemic, has various cultural and social consequences, affecting all aspects of social life. This study examines the social factors that influence how people cope with Covid-19 disease. The study focuses on religiosity and social indifference as social components that influence people’s response to Covid-19 in the dimensions of behavior, emotion, and attitude. The theoretical framework of the present paper is based on religious coping theory, according to which religious people face human crises in a wiser and more relaxed manner. According to the religious rationalism approach, religious tendencies play an effective role in shaping people’s responsible behavior in the face of Covid-19 disease.
Method: This study was conducted by using a survey in which data were collected by a questionnaire. The statistical population of this study was all people living in Tehran city, and 300 people were selected as the research sample by a cluster method appropriate to the size. The method consisted of first considering each of the 22 districts of Tehran as a cluster. Then, according to the population of each cluster, a number of areas were randomly selected from each of them. Finally, blocks were randomly selected in the selected areas, and within each block, a number of households were selected using a simple random sampling method. In the sample selection, the percentage of randomly selected individuals from each group was equal to the percentage of the same group in the target population.
Findings: The results show that most of the respondents, 34.4%, have a college degree and most of them, about 30%, are students. Regarding the context variables, there is no significant relationship between the “Facing the COVID -19” index and the marital status of the individuals. Of course, women are slightly more likely than men to follow health tips and social distance. On the other hand, there is a significant relationship between this index and the level of education; that is, as the level of education increases, people show better behavior toward coronary disease. The average value of the “Facing the COVID -19” index is 4, which means that the respondents largely follow the health recommendations. The mean score of the sample population for “religiosity” is 3.48, indicating a relatively high level of religiosity. The percentage of “social indifference” in the sample is almost low. Thus, 46.2% of individuals have low indifference and 19.8% have very low indifference. The results of the multivariate regression test show that there is a significant relationship between the index “Facing the COVID-19” and independent variables in different dimensions (R = 0.427). The results of this study show that there is an indirect relationship between “social indifference” and “Facing the COVID-19” (B = -0.268); when social indifference increases among people, they follow less health advice. “Religiosity” also has a direct effect on the management of Covid-19 disease (B = 0.242), such that religious people try more than others to show responsible behavior in dealing with this disease.
Conclusion: Two main research hypotheses were confirmed. According to them, the strongest significant relationship between “Facing the COVID-19” and independent variables is associated with the “social indifference” index (r = -0.365). This shows that with the increase of social indifference among people in society, the level of compliance with health protocols among them has decreased and these people act more negligence in the face of corona. On the other hand, by decreasing indifference and increasing social responsibility, people will be more reasonable and responsible to corona disease. On the other hand, there is a significant positive correlation between Facing the COVID-19 and religiosity (r = 0.347). This finding confirms another hypothesis of the study and shows that religious people follow the principles of social distancing more than others. The higher people’s religiosity, the better they behave in terms of health advice during corona outbreak.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Alavipour, S. M., & Ahadi, H. (2020), Humanities and Corona Collection 1; The New Suffering of the Treasure of Hope, Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (In Persian)
  • Aronson, E. (2007), Social Psychology, Translated by Hossein Shokrkan, second edition, Tehran: Roshd Publications. (In Persian)
  • Bagheri, Y., Akbarporoshan, N., Assyrian, Y., & Soleimani, M. (2020), “Corona and aggravation of poverty;A Review of International Reports on the Impact of Poverty on the Corona ”, Policy Reports of the Higher Institute for Social Security Research on the Corona Virus, No. 13: 1-7. (In Persian)
  • Baghi, E.(2021), “Sociology of Corona Theology: Religious Challenges and the Final Output”, Social Studies of Iran, No. 4: 6-31. (In Persian)
  • Baker, J. O., Martí, G., Braunstein, R., Whitehead, A. L., & Yukich, G. (2020), “Religion in the age of social distancing: How COVID-19 presents new directions for research”, Sociology of Religion, No. 81: 357-370.
  • Bansbardi, A., Nazari Tarshizi, A., & Moayed, N. (2019), "Analysis of Ethical Tendencies of Athletic Students: The Role of Religiosity, Gender and Type of Sports", Research in Educational Sports, No. 17: 139-158. (In Persian)
  • Benjamins, M. R., Christopher, G., Ellison, N., Krause, M., & Marcum, J. P. (2011), “Religion and Preventive Service Use: Do Congregational Support and Religious Beliefs Explain the Relationship between Attendance and Utilization?”, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, No. 34: 462–476.
  • Bentzen, J. (2020), “In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic”, Economic Policy Research, No. 8: 49-63.
  • Boguszewski, R., Makowska, M., Bożewicz, M., & Podkowińska, M. (2020), “The COVID-19 Pandemic’s Impact on Religiosity in Poland”, Religions journal, No. 11: 612-646.
  • Bussing, A., Kerdar, S. H., Akbari, M. E., & Rassouli, M. (2021), “Perceptions of Spiritual Dryness in Iran During the COVID-19 Pandemic”, Journal of Religion and Health, No. 59: 1-25.
  • Carey, L. B., Cohen, J., Koenig, H. G., Gabbay, E., & Carey, L. (2021), “COVID‑19, Sex, Addictions, Women’s Health, Care of the Elderly, and Medical Education”, Journal of Religion and Health, No. 60:1425–1429.
  • Chitsaz, M. J. (2020), “Corona and Religiosity: Challenges and Analyzes”, Social Impact Assessment, Issue of Consequences of Corona-Covid 19 Outbreak, No. 2: 151-162. (In Persian)
  • Fastame, M. C., Ruiu, M., & Mulas, I. (2021), “Mental Health and Religiosity in the Sardinian Blue Zone: Life Satisfaction and Optimism for Aging Well”, Journal of Religion and Health, No. 60: 1-13.
  • Fazeli, N. (2020), “Ethnography of the Iranian corona”, a collection of articles on the corona and Iranian society; Cultural and Social Aspects, Institute of Culture, Art and Communication, No. 1: 25-44. (In Persian)
  • Ganji, M., and Hilali Sotoudeh, M. (2011), “The relationship between religiosity and social capital (theoretical and experimental approach among the people of Kashan)”, Applied Sociology, No. 42: 95-120. (In Persian)
  • Ghaderi, S., & Niloufar, O. (2020), “Religion and Covid 19 part of the problem part of the solution”, Social Studies of Iran, No. 4: 75-92. (In Persian)
  • Ghaemi, F., Balali, I., & Mohammad Ghodsi, A. (2015), “The relationship between religiosity and social indifference in the city of Hamedan”, Hamedan Disciplinary Science, No. 6: 99-115. (In Persian)
  • Graafland, J. (2017), “Religiosity, attitude, and the demand for socially responsible products”, Journal of Business Ethics, No. 144: 121-138.
  • Hamilton, M. (2008), Sociology of Religion, Translated by Mohsen Salesi, Tehran: Sales Publication. (In Persian)
  • Hayward, R. D., Krause, N., Ironson, G., & Pargament, K. I. (2016), “Externalizing religious health beliefs and health and well-being outcomes”, Journal of behavioral medicine, No. 39: 887-895.
  • Ifeanyi Ede, V., & ZuokeKalu, D. (2020), “Coping With Covid-19 Pandemic In Africa: The Religious Coping Option”, The Socio-religious Dynamics in Africa, Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for the Promotion of African Studies on the Impact of Covid-19 on Africa, No. 1: 10-23.
  • Isiko, A. P. (2020), “Religious construction of disease: An exploratory appraisal of religious responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda”, Journal of African Studies and Development, No. 12: 77-96.
  • Kalantari, M., & Kalantari, A. (2012), "Religiosity in different generations (case study of Sari city)", Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 2: 173-200. (In Persian)
  • Kitabi, M., Ganji, M., Ahmadi, Y., & Masoumi, R. (2004), “Religion, Social Capital and Social and Cultural Development”, University of Isfahan Humanities Research, No. 2: 169-192. (In Persian)
  • Kowalczyk, O., Roszkowski, K., Montane, X., Pawliszak, W., Tylkowski, B., & Bajek, A. (2020), “Religion and Faith Perception in a Pandemic of COVID-19”, Journal of religion and health, No. 59: 2671-2677.
  • Lucchetti, G., Góes, L. G., Amaral, S. G., Ganadjian, G. T., Andrade, I., Almeida, P. O., & Manso, M. E. (2020), “Spirituality, religiosity and the mental health consequences of social isolation during Covid-19 pandemic”, The International journal of social psychiatry, No. 2: 93-122.
  • Luchetti, M., Lee, J. H., Aschwanden, D., Sesker, A., Strickhouser, J. E., Terracciano, A., & Sutin, A. R. (2020), “The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19”, American Psychologist, No. 8: 1-12.
  • Meza, D. (2020), “In a pandemic are we more religious? Traditional Practices of Catholics and the COVID-19 in Southwestern Colombia”, International Journal of Latin American Religions, No. 4: 218-234.
  • Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education (2021), the latest corona statistics in Iran, available at https://behdasht.gov.ir/news. (In Persian)
  • MirMohammadi, M. S., Haghighatian, M., and Jahanbakhsh, I. (2016), “Socio-cultural factors affecting the responsibility of youth in Tehran”, Strategic Studies of Sports and Youth, No. 34: 151-167. (In Persian)
  • Mirsandesi, M. (2004), Measuring the extent and types of religiosity among students, PhD Thesis in Sociology, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian)
  • Mirzaei, H. (2015), Research in Higher Education, Science and the Corona Crisis in Iran, Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian)
  • Moblaghi, A. (2020), “Responsible decision making; The Most Fundamental Shari'a Right Against Corona”, Humanities and Corona 1; The New Suffering of the Treasure of Hope, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, No. 1: 154-159. (In Persian)
  • Mohaddesi Gilvaei, H. (2020), “Corona and some traditional religious beliefs”, a collection of articles by Corona and Iranian society; Cultural and Social Aspects, Institute of Culture, Art and Communication, No. 1: 331-341. (In Persian)
  • Mohseni Tabrizi, A., & Sedaghatifard, M. (2011), “Research on Social Indifference in Iran; Case study of Tehran citizens”, Applied Sociology, No. 43: 1-22. (In Persian)
  • Molteni, F., Ladini, R., Biolcati, F., Chiesi, A. M., Dotti Sani, G. M., Guglielmi, S., & Vezzoni, C. (2021), “Searching for comfort in religion: insecurity and religious behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy”, European Societies, No. 23: 704-720.
  • Mottaqinia, G. (2021), “The role of spirituality and religiosity in the post-traumatic development of coronavirus in Iran”, Yafteh Quarterly, No. 23: 56-71. (In Persian)
  • Qaderzadeh, O., & Radman, M. (2018), "Social indifference of young people and socio-cultural rupture; Bukan Youth Survey Study, Strategic Studies of Sports and Youth, No. 39: 59-76. (In Persian)
  • Rafiei, M., Khorsandi, A., & Abbasi, S. (2018), "Predicting the responsibility of employees based on religiosity and moral intelligence in the universities of Bijar", Culture in Islamic University, No. 28: 381-402. (In Persian)
  • Rezaei, F., Bahyan, S., & Chitsaz, M. A. (2021), "Sociological explanation of factors related to political indifference with emphasis on religiosity (case study: citizens of Ahvaz)", Sociological Research, No. 1: 7-29. (In Persian)
  • Ridenour, J., Campbell, C. D., Bufford, R. K., & Gathercoal, K. (2008), The role of spirituality and the impact on social responsibility, California: Grad School of Clinical Psychology, Faculty Publications.
  • Rigoli, F. (2021), “The Link Between COVID-19, Anxiety, and Religious Beliefs in the United States and the United Kingdom”, Journal of Religion and Health, No. 60:43-61.
  • Safiri, K., Mirsandesi, M., & Amo Abdollahi, F. (2016), "Study of the relationship between critical thinking and the main dimensions of religiosity among graduate students", Studies and Social Research in Iran, No. 3: 457-484. (In Persian)
  • Sayin, O., & Bozkurt, V. (2021), “Sociology of coronavirus conspiracies in Turkey: Who believes and why”, The societal impacts of COVID-19: A transnational perspective, No. 1: 79-91.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992), “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, No. 25: 1–65.
  • Smith, L. G., & Gibson, S. (2020), “Social psychological theory and research on the novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic: Introduction to the rapid response special section”, The British journal of social psychology, No. 59: 571- 568.
  • Solgi, M., Motalebi, D., & Gholamipour, I. (2020), Corona and Iranian society; Cultural and social aspects, Tehran: Research Institute of Culture, Art and Communication. (In Persian)
  • Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., & Willer, R. (2020), “Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response”, Nature human behaviour, No. 4: 460-471.
  • Wolf, L., Haddock, G., Manstead, A. S. R., & Maio, G. R. (2020), “The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic”, British Journal of Social Psychology, No. 59: 618–627.
  • Worldometer (2021), coronavirus page, in worldometers.info/coronavirus/