An Analysis on the Trend of Social Demand for Studying in “Higher Education” Academic Major

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Faculty Member of the Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, and Project executor from the collection of "ETELA" project, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

2 Faculty Member of the Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Project main collaborator from the collection of "ETELA" project, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

Abstract

Introduction:The accepted social demand in higher education academic major plays an important role in providing the specialized human resources of the society in different educational levels and especially, in master and PhD level, in terms of produce and disseminate science, solving the problems of the higher education system and the country. Therefore, with an analysis of the process of accepting social demand in this field, it will be possible to respond appropriately to these demands. Also, it will be useful for policy making and planning regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of higher education and measuring and accepting students based on Ministry of Science, Research and Technology needs.
Method:This study is an applied research. The aim was to analyze the trend of social demand for studying in higher education academic major. The statistics of all accepted social demands in the field of higher education in all educational levels including PhD, master, bachelor and associate degrees with different orientations, from the establishment of this academic major (academic year 2012-2013) was studied. Data collection was used documentary and library studies, and the statistics used were obtained from the Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education. The method of analysis was the analysis of the content of the documents (secondary analysis).
Findings:The findings indicated that the highest number of accepted demand in the associate degree and bachelor degree were in 2008-2009. Also, the highest number of accepted demand in the master degree was in 2011-2012 and the highest number of accepted demand in was 2017-2018. From the academic year of 2013-2014 (until 2018-2019), the number of PhD students has always been significantly higher than the other academic levels. In all years of admission, the number of males was more than females. According to the statistics of the trend of accepting social demands and also, the statistics of graduates of this academic major in master and PhD degrees, it is estimated that there will be 154 master graduates and 118 PhD graduates. In other words, there will 154 theses and 118 dissertations in this field, each of those has been written on various practical topics. 
Discussion: What can be assessed from the study of the accepted social demand trend in associate degree is the isolation of higher education institutions. Therefore, due to the relatively long interval between two periods of student admission at this academic level, the role of superior institutes is highlighted. Because course titles and their acceptance capacity is determined by policy makers in this field, such as Student Assessment and Admission Council and so on. Therefore, it can be said that in our country, the accepted demand in this major and at this level has been based more on the decisions of policymakers than the real social demand of individuals to choose this academic major. Also, the trend of admission for bachelor degree indicates that the social demand is not taken into account in accepting students of this major; rather, other criteria and indicators for attracting and accepting students have been considered. It is necessary to pay attention to the role of higher education institutions in creating, constructing and guiding the social demand of individuals to continue their education. According to ascending trend of accepting PhD student, it will be expected that a large number of specialized human resource with higher and postgraduate education enter to the country educational system and to produce and disseminate specialized science and knowledge in this field. Since in the master degree in this major, in most years, especially since 2011, the most accepted social demand has always been related to females; it was expected that in PhD level, the accepted social demand for females be higher than for males. But in real this has not been occurred. This issue can be based on various factors, and this would be due to personal, cultural, family and social issues related to females' tendency to pursue their study in this academic major. One of the consequences of the decrease in females demand for studying PhD degree in this major will be seen on recruiting faculty members, maintaining the gender composition of professors in this field, and managerial positions in higher education.

Keywords


  • Akbari, N. (2001), “Mutual effect and spatial relationship of population structure and social demand for higher education in Iran. Institution for Research and Planning in Higher Education”. Project of specialized manpower needs assessment and human resource development policy. No. 16
  • Andishmand, V. (2009), “Identifying the components of social capital in universities in order to provide a model for its promotion”, Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and administration, No 3(2): 9-34.
  • Arasteh, H.R. & Jamshidi, L. (2014), “Factors affecting the quantitative development of higher education privatization in Iran”, Journal of Educational Sciences, No 6(21), 83-112.
  • Bokaei, M.N., Siami araghi, E. &; Fahimifar, F. (2017). Influencing factors on higher education in Iran (Economic modeling approach). Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 7(20), 57-71
  • Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2011). “Flexibility in Higher Education: Revisiting Expectations. Scientific”, Journal of Media Literacy, N0 37: 15-24.
  • Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2011), “Flexibility in Higher Education: Revisiting Expectations. Scientific Journal of Media Literacy, 37, 15-24.
  • Emad Malekinia, E., Malekinia, M. & Feizi, S. (2018). Survey on Imperative Strategies for Iranian's Higher Education System in Globalization Age. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and strategic Policies, 6(24), 518-545
  • Frasr, Sh. & Deane, E. (1997). “Why Open Learning? Australian Universities”, Review, No1: 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy022
  • Ghaneirad, M.A. & KhosroKhavar, F. (2006).  A Study on the Cultural Factors Influencing the Increase in Girl’s Entrance into Universities. Women in Development and Politics, 4(4), 115-138.
  • Gharun, M. (2002). Estimation of social demand for higher education in Iran in 2001-2009. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 8(4), 71-118.
  • Joan, R. (2013), “Flexible learning as new learning design in classroom process to promote quality education”, i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, No 9(1): 37-42.
  • Karami, M.R., Poorkarimi, J., Hajkhozymeh, M. & Babayi, M. (2018). Identification and Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Social Demand for Higher Education (Case Study: Graduate Students at Campuses of Technical Colleges of University of Tehran). Higher education letter, 11(41), 35-58
  • KarnameHaghighi, H., & Akbari, N. (2005). Investigating Women's Participation in Social Demand for Higher Education in Iran. Women's research. 3(1), 69-100.
  • Langelett, G.; Chang, K. L.; Ola’Akinfenwa, S.; Jorgensen, N. & Bhattarai, K. (2015). “Elasticity of demand for tuition fees at an institution of higher education”, Journal of higher education policy and management, No37 (1): 111-119.
  • Mahdizadeh, M. & hashemi, S.Z. (2019). Sociological Analysis of Factors Affecting Social Demand for Ph.D. (Case Study of Ph.D Students of Tehran Universities). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 8(4), 819-846.
  • Mahjoub Ishratabadi, H. & Qaruneh, D. (2014). Examining the criteria for assessing the quality of e-learning in higher education and providing a framework for evaluating it. First National Conference on Quality Assessment in Academic Systems. Tehran, Sharif University of Technology.
  • Menon, L.M. (1998), “Factors influencing the demand for higher education: the case of Cyprus”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, No 35: 251-266. 
  • Ministry of Culture and Higher Education. (1999). General specifications of the program and the syllabus of higher education doctoral courses. Supreme Council of planning. Humanities Group, Educational Sciences Committee.
  • Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (2001). General specifications of the program and the syllabus of higher education doctoral courses. Supreme Council of planning. Humanities Group
  • Mokhtarian, F. (2015). A Review of Factors Affecting the Social Demand of Higher Education, First National Congress on Humanities Transformation and Innovation, Shiraz, Kharazmi Higher Institute of Science and Technology, https://www.civilica.com/Paper-ICCIH01- ICCIH01_118.html
  • Navid Adham, M. (2012). Managerial Requirements of Fundamental Change in Education System. Strategy for Culture, 5(17-18), 295-323.
  • Noroozi chakoli, A. & Madadi, Z. (2015). Impact of economic power on science and technology situation of countries and the analyzing of their cross-relations. Scientometrics Research Journal, 1(2), 1-14.
  • Oliveira, M.; Vieira, C. & Vieira, I. (2015), “Modelling demand for higher education: A partial least-squares analysis of Portugal”, European Journal of Higher Education,No 5 (4): 388-406.
  • Sabeti, M., homayoun Sepehr, M. & Ahmadi, F. (2014). The Role of Higher Education in National Development. Journal of Iranian Social development Studies, 6(4), 59-69
  • Sadeh, S., Mirramezani, M., Mesgaran, M., Feizpour, A., Azadi, P. (2019), “Stanford Iran 2040 Project: The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption”, Stanford University, Working Paper: 7.
  • Shiri, M., Noorullahi, T. (2012). Changes in population structure and social demand for higher education in Iran. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 23(1), 83-102.
  • Stafford, K.L., Lundstedt, S.B., and Lynn, A.D. (1984). “Social and economic factors affecting participation in higher education”, The Journal of Higher Education, No 55: 590-608.
  • Zahiri Niya, M. & Beroziyan, B. (2012). The Comparison of Effective Factors on Entrance of Men and Women to University. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 3(12), 69-90