Attachment to the neighborhood represents a positive mental feeling toward the residential place that links associated with residential location and causing the residents’ commitment to habitat and their desire to maintain a relationship with it over the time and at different stages of life. Present research examines neighborhood attachment and the effect of personal networks and modern communication mediums on attachment.Both local and nonlocal ties are considered. Population of the survey consists of people aged over 15 years old residingin different districts of Tehran.The sample size is 391 respondents who were randomly chosen through cluster sampling method from districts 3, 11 and 18 of the city. Four neighborhoods in each district were randomly selected. Based on the results,the level of neighborhood attachment is medium. Most of the individuals’ties are nonlocal.While the localties have significant effect on attachment to the neighborhood, nonlocal ties are not related to it. The findings also show that among the new communication medium, the Internet does not have significant effect on attachment to the neighborhood .Among the demographic and neighborhood characteristics, age, family income, and length of residence are positively associated with the attachment to neighborhood.
· آمارنامه شهر تهران (1390)، سالنامه آماری شهر تهران: سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران.
امیرکافی، مهدی و فتحی، شکوفه (1390)، «بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر دلبستگی به محلۀ مسکونی (مطالعه موردی شهرکرمان)»، مجلۀ مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، شماره1: 5-41.
باستانی، سوسن (1387)، «بررسی سرمایۀ اجتماعی شبکه در 10 محلۀ تهران: بررسی جایگاه روابط محلی در شبکههای اجتماعی»، مجلۀ مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، شماره 2: 55-74.
باستانی، سوسن و صالحیهیکویی، مریم (1385)، «سرمایۀ اجتماعی شبکه و جنسیت: بررسی ویژگیهای ساختی، تعاملی و کارکردی شبکۀ اجتماعی زنان و مردان تهران»، مجله نامه علوم اجتماعی، شماره30: 63-96.
چلبی، مسعود (1375)، جامعه‌شناسی نظم، تحلیل و تشریح نظری نظم اجتماعی، تهران: نشرنی.
طاوسی، سیما (1389)، رابطۀ دلبستگی محیطی با میزان سلامت روان و سازگاری اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان سال اول دبیرستان شهرستان ورامین، پایاننامۀ کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی دانشگاه الزهرا.
فکوهی، ناصر و میردامادی، مهرداد (1381)، «فضای سایبرنتیک به مثابۀ فضای شهری در تهران»، نامۀ انسان‌شناسی، شماره 2: 89-120
فیروزآبادی، احمد (1387)، شبکهسازی برای افزایش سرمایۀ اجتماعی، مرکز مطالعات و برنامهریزی شهرداری تهران.
Beggs, J., Hurlbert, J., & Haines, V. (1996),”Community attachment in a rural setting: A refinement and empirical test of the systemic model”, Rural Sociology, 61:407–426
Bolan, M., (1997), “The Mobility Experience and Neighborhood Attachment”, Demography, 34(2): 225-237.
Brocato D.elisabeth(2006), place attachment:an investigation of environments and outcomes in a service context, for the Degree of doctor of philosophy the university of texas at arilington
Chavis, D. M. and Abraham Wandersman (1990), “Sense of Community in the Urban Environment: A Catalyst for Participation and Community Development”, American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1):55–81
Cuba, L. and D.M. Hummon (1993),”A Place to Call Home: Identification with Dwelling, Community and Region”, The Sociological Quarterly, 34(1): 111-131
Goudy, W.J., (1990),”Community Attachment in a Rural Region”, Rural Sociology, 55(2): 178-198.
Hidalgo, M. C., & Herna´ ndez, B. (2001), “Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281
Hummon D.M. (1992),”Community attachment: local sentiment and sense of place”, in I Altman, S M Low (eds.).Place Attachment, Plenum Press, London, pp 253-278
Kasarda,J D. and M.Janowitz. (1974), “Community attachment in mass society”, American Sociological Review, 39:328-39.
Lewicka, M .(2010)". What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment", Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (2010) 35–51
Liao, P, (2004)".Emotional Attachment, Residential Satisfaction, and Mobility Propensity". The Journal of Demography, June: 49-79.
Livingston, M & Bailey, Nick. Ade Kearns (2008), “People’s Attachment To Place – The Influence Of Neighbourhood Deprivation”, Published by the Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Low, S. & Altman, I. (1992), “Place attachment: A concep-tual Inquiry”, In I. Althman & S. Low (Eds), Place Attachment, New York: Plenum
Manzo C. Lynne& Douglas D. Perkins (2006 ), “Finding Common Ground:The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning”, Journal of Planning Literature, 20: 4 .
Mesch .G & Ilan Talmud (2010).”Internet Connectivity, Community Participation,and Place Attachment:A Longitudinal Study”, American Behavioral Scientist 53(8): 1095–1110
Mesch, G.S. and Manor, O. (1998),”Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment”, Environment and Behavior, 30(4): 504-519.
Rollero .Ch., & Norma De Piccoli.(2010), “Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 : 198–205
Sampson, R. J. (1988), “Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society:A multilevel systemic model”, American Sociological Review, 53: 766−779.
Shamsuddin , Sh & Norsidah Ujang(2008), “.Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia”, Habitat International, (32): 399–409.
Taylor R. (1996), “.Neighborhood Responses to Disorder and Local Attachments:The Systemic Model Of Attachment,Social Disorganization,and Neighborhood Use Value”,Sociological Forum, No 11: 41-74.
Teddy. L; Linda Waimarie Nikora & Bernard Guerin .(2008), “Place attachment of Ngāi Te Ahi to Hairini Marae”, MAI Review, No1: 42-60.
Theodori, G. (2000), “Levels of analysis and conceptual clarification in community attachment and satisfaction research: Connections to community development”, Journal of the Community Development Society, No 31(1): 35-58
Theodori, Gene L. and A. E. Luloff (2000), “Urbanization and Community Attachment in Rural Areas”, Society & Natural Resources, No 13: 399-420
Wellman, B(2005), “community:from neighborhood to networks”, communications of the acm,No 1: 655-664.
Wellman, B. (1996), “Are Personal Communities Local? A Dumptarian Reconsideration”, Social Networks,No18: 347-354.
Wellman, B. (2002), “Little boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism”, In Digital Cities, edited by M. Tanabe, P. van den Bessclaar, and T. Ishida. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Wellman, B.( 2001), “Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Personalized Networking”, InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, No25: 227–252.
Wellman.B. et al.(2003), “The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individ-ualism”, JCMC, No 3: 475-516.
Wilkinson, Kenneth P. (1991), The Community in Rural America. Middletown, WI: Social Ecology Press.
Woldoff, R. A. (2002), “The effects of local stressors on neighborhood attachment, Social Forces”, No 81: 87−116.
· Hampton. K , & Wellman .B.(2003), “Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and social capital in aWired suburb”, City and Community2(4):277-313
Bastani, S., & Nikzad, S. (2014). Personal Networks and Neighborhood Attachment in Tehran city:with emphasis on the role of modern communication mediums. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3(2), 193-219. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2014.53136
MLA
Susan Bastani; Salmeh Nikzad. "Personal Networks and Neighborhood Attachment in Tehran city:with emphasis on the role of modern communication mediums", Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3, 2, 2014, 193-219. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2014.53136
HARVARD
Bastani, S., Nikzad, S. (2014). 'Personal Networks and Neighborhood Attachment in Tehran city:with emphasis on the role of modern communication mediums', Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 3(2), pp. 193-219. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2014.53136
VANCOUVER
Bastani, S., Nikzad, S. Personal Networks and Neighborhood Attachment in Tehran city:with emphasis on the role of modern communication mediums. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 2014; 3(2): 193-219. doi: 10.22059/jisr.2014.53136
)